Nein and Nine a.k.a. Learn to read skeptics!

The skeptics today are fawning over paparazzo Jamie Fawcett for a misleading and untruthful interview he gave. We say "Nein!", or "No!" to it all.

National Ledger

By Philippa Bourke
Dec 14, 2009


Breathing life into an old battle, photographer Jamie Fawcett and Nicole Kidman are firing rockets at each other over the actress's claim that paparazzi - namely, Fawcett - drove her out of Sydney.

Keith Urban Wife Nicole Kidman - Paparazzi Battle (Image: Splash News)

Hitting the airwaves before her Christmas break at home, Kidman revived her claim that she cannot live in Australia's biggest city because of paparazzi.

She took Fawcett to court after he bugged her Darling Point waterfront property, which she has since sold. The snapper has now gone on the counter-attack, accusing Kidman of playing "Machiavellian games" with the media. He told the Macquarie Radio Network it was simply not true the paparazzi shadow Kidman's every move in Sydney.


***


He said: "I don't have a personal vendetta against Nicole Kidman. These are Machiavellian games that are being played and they are just not right. If she doesn't want to be photographed, she should change her profession and become a butcher." He claimed although international stars do whip up a frenzy, Kidman will say one thing and then do another, citing comments she would give up acting after having her child, Sunday Rose.

"She's done this before - right now she's got something to promote and she's playing games with the media," he said. Kidman, who last year bought a massive heritage property two hours out of Sydney and a condo on the city's North Shore, said: "It [photographers] makes certain cities impossible to live in. Like Sydney, it makes it impossible for us to live there. We certainly don't get that treatment in Tennessee. But it goes with the territory. It's just, we have to be careful, just to maintain some sort of semblance of a normal life for our child."

So if you recall many websites incorrectly reported that Kidman slammed her hometown of Sydney. Those who can read saw it for what it was...A truth turned into something entirely different. Kidman stated that the daily media intrusion in Sydney made it impossible to live there.

“It makes certain cities impossible to live in. Like Sydney, it makes it impossible for us to live there,”

Would a skeptic like to tell us how Kidman bashed Sydney? That was a rhetorical question.

But let's get back to Fawcett and his game playing.


"She's done this before - right now she's got something to promote and she's playing games with the media"

So when is she supposed to be interviewed? When she's at home not working?




Kidman will say one thing and then do another, citing comments she would give up acting after having her child, Sunday Rose.

What difference does it make what she decides to do with her career? Oops, unless you think one of your biggest meal tickets will go into retirement and then no one will want to buy your photos?




"If she doesn't want to be photographed, she should change her profession and become a butcher"

Oh but she already said "But it goes with the territory. It's just, we have to be careful, just to maintain some sort of semblance of a normal life for our child."




These are Machiavellian games that are being played and they are just not right.

Oh Jamie you are the biggest game player of them all. You aren't ashamed of what you do and how you do it so why say anything? You lost in court and deservedly so because of your massive ego and shady tactics so is this payback? Because your attempt is laughable. Kidman didn't single you out in the interview but here you are trying to save face. We couldn't help but notice something very curious about your interview...what could it be????


YOU NEVER ONCE DENIED FOLLOWING KIDMAN IN SYDNEY. YOU DID NOT DENY HASSLING HER OR MAKING LIFE DIFFICULT FOR HER WHEN SHE IS THERE.

JAMIE FAWCETT, YOU AREN'T A VICTIM, YOU'RE AN INSTIGATOR. YOU AREN'T THE HUNTED, BUT THE HUNTER.


So Jamie and skeptics, we can see past and through it all. Skeptics we know you love liars and with quotes like this it's no wonder

nomorefan: "Glad to see Jamie is not backing down and continues to speak up against Third Lip's BS!"

MImosa: "He's callin her out with her BS.
Love to hear Jamie say somethibng terrific about Keith and leave Nicole's name out the article. Slam her against the wall with NINE with a review."


And sorry to rain on your parade skeptics but Keith said similar sentiments about the paps in Sydney earlier after he flew back this month. You all aren't fooling anyone and neither is Fawcett. Enjoy the boneheaded company.

Before we close this topic, here's a visual reminder of who you are in bed with skeptics. This is a photo of Fawcett and fellow pap Shane Partridge in 2006. After camping outside her home they followed her to a children's hospital where the brawl happened. Classy, eh? And Fawcett wants you believe its all innocent what he does for a living. The nasty details available at the link.

















Fawcett Brawl



***********************************

Now onto better news,

Nine earned a record breaking amount of nominations from The Broadcast Film Critics Association. 10 nominations in all. Congratulations to everyone!!!

BEST PICTURE

BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS
Marion Cotillard

BEST ACTING ENSEMBLE

BEST CINEMATOGRAPHY
Mauro Fiore

BEST ART DIRECTION
John Myhre & Gordon Sim

BEST EDITING
Claire Simpson & Wyatt Smith

BEST COSTUME DESIGN
Colleen Atwood

BEST MAKEUP

BEST SOUND

BEST SONG
“Cinema Italiano” – Maury Yeston

BFCA List Of Nominees