January 24, 2010

It's THE SKEPTICS That Are Worried


The skeptics are abuzz on the rumor that Nicole Kidman has hired a manger. She hasn't had one in the past. Some actors choose to have one and some don't. She still maintains her place at Creative Artists Agency, the elite Los Angeles firm and Shanahan Management in Australia, home to a huge number of internationally successful Aussie actors like Geoffrey Rush and Toni Collette. Why she wants a manager is up for debate. But as a guess with her production company in full swing, how or what projects Kidman chooses to pursue may be taking a different turn.

Who this alleged new manager is, Geyer Kosinski, is not important. What is important to point out is this is the 150th time the skeptics claim to have the proof Kidman is worried about her career. Yet we've been hearing cross-talk for 5 years Nicole Kidman has no career. Just another contradiction the skeptics hope you don't notice.

BAHAHAHA!

The truth is readers skeptic fear is what is behind all this. They are worried with the right film, the right timing, and most of all, Kidman talent, (with or without a new manager) the woman they despise most in the world will be up on the Oscar stage accepting another statue or adding "major American hit" to her already impressive resume.

But not surprisingly we agree with you skeptics. You should be worried. Just yesterday you tried reverse racism, ignorance, insensitivity, and bold-face lies to cut down an important event that will help so many, simply because Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban were involved.

But there's also the meltdown you all are having. Readers shall we take a look?

dumbfounded: F-off


I'll wait 'till the air clears because once again, thanks to posters like yourself and others, coming here is just no fun.


You're a jerk. Your comments have no place here and you know it. People like you is the main reason I tend to stay gone for months on end. Just when it's safe to go back in the water, sharks like you who are fairly new to the board upset a good thread.


flyin: The line might be if you aren't in Love with and worship the ground they walk on, both KUNK then your Negative.


dumbfounded:Then I'm sorry. Truly. I am seeing red like a pit bull right now because our thread has been hijacked again by all the ridiculous crap. I'm just so angry about it. I'm sorry.



Mimosa: You do not owe this poster an apology....she's part of the problem.



nomorefan: Dear Skeptics, do you see what's going on here? Come on - take the high road. Don't play these games.



dumbfounded: Yes, I do see what's going on. Just very angry. Will go cool off. All I wanted to do was just come in here and post about Drama Boy's performance (seriously, Mr. High Heels, did you really need the shoulder moves for that night? GAG.)He's such a fameho.

dumbfounded: YOU KNOW WHAT, THIS IS WHAT ****** ME OFF ABOUT THIS THREAD. WE CAN'T EVEN COME ON TO ONE PIDLEY LITTLE THREAD WITHOUT THERE BEING SOME SORT OF POSTER AND/OR POSTERS WHO REFUSE TO READ THE RULES AND ABIDE BY THEM. AGAIN, THIS IS A FREGGIN' NEGATIVE THREAD. THERE ARE SEVERAL OTHER KUNK THREADS WHERE A VARIETY OF OPINIONS ARE WELCOMED, AND THERE IS THE POSITIVE THREAD IN WHICH TO STATE THOSE POSITIVE OPINIONS. CAN WE NOT JUST HAVE ONE FREAKIN' THREAD WHERE THERE IS NO DISSENTION OR BAITING? CAN WE NOT JUST HAVE ONE FREAKIN' PLACE WHERE WE CAN COME TO MOCK THOSE WACKOS? WHY MUST THIS PARTICULAR THREAD BE A MAGNET FOR THOSE WHO "INNOCENTLY" ADD IN THEIR VIEWS KNOWING FULL WELL THAT THIS IS NOT THE THREAD FOR ANYTHING REMOTELY POSITIVE ABOUT STUPID KUNK?????

I DON'T GET IT. I DON'T GET IT AT ALL AND IT IS INCREDIBLY UNFAIR. AND YES, THESE ARE ALL CAPS BECAUSE I AM PISSSSSED OFF.

GOOOOOOOOOOOD, GOOOOOOOOOOOOO AWAY AND POST ON A DIFFERENT THREAD, NEWBIES. YOU DIDN'T READ THE RULES, YOU DON'T ABIDE BY THEM, AND YOU BAIT US ON PURPOSE. UNLESS YOU CANNOT STAND THOSE TWO FAMEHOES, THEN LEAVE US THE HELLLLL ALONE.


Mimosa: Best post ever.



We can see skeptics you're having a tough run. With all the positive KUNK energy out there, and we aren't talking about the E! thread, it's hard to keep it up. You're desperate and will resort to desperate measures...like going though a rash of questions that the skeptics are already supposed to know the answers to because of their sources, friends, and of course eyes in the back of their heads.

Keep worrying skeptics.....

14 Comments:

Anonymous said...

Mimsy was drunk last night.

Anonymous said...

Who is Susie girl and the horrid name not to pass the lips of the virgin flyin ?

flyin = You know the one who is so proud of her posting record since 2006. LMAO
Girl thats a lot of years of hate inside that crazy mind of yours.
2006 was that the year you got you a$$ thrown off all the other boards where other sane people post?

WhatAWaste said...

Yep, Mimosa was completely whacked out, and dumbshit went even further off the deep end than ever before.

They definitely go into crazy, obsessed hater overtime when they don't read complete & absolute hate on "their" thread. That is some scary shit, if you ask me!

Anonymous said...

hit n run comes out of lurking for a month!

flyin must be laying down in her strait jacket taking a much needed rest.


dot dot dot


(as in connecting)

SkewerMistress said...

Susie Girl is the revamped name of new poster "satans girl". Apparently flyin is too tight with Christ to even post the word! BAHAHAHAHA!

Anonymous said...

ha ha SM.

Thanks. I guess I didn't get the "hater speak" . LMAO

Ain't they so clever? AwShucks, we are just God fearing , church goin, soft spoken, truth seeking, family lovin,

HATERS!

THANK_YOU said...

I see UM's blog has questions they've posted for Keith. How about they make up a list for their substitute boyfriends, Brad Paisley and Jimmy Wayne? Why Keith Urban who they could care less about???

If I was Keith, I know what my answer would be to each & every question...


"None of your f-ing business!"



Maybe that's an idea for a future blog entry SM: A list of questions we could ask the haters!

Anonymous said...

If they were sure about themselves and their so called "insiders" information, they wouldn't care who posted on their precious thread. They can't stand opposition because they can't back themselves and their lies. It's not a discussion thread, it's a hate thread and E should wise up.

Anonymous said...

Dumbfounded should drop the founded and go by her real name.

satins girl seems to have her own agenda against taralea. I'd advice everyone to just ignore them.

Anonymous said...

nomorefan

Posts: 11,936
Registered: 6/23/06
Re: KEITH URBAN - THE NEGATIVE THREAD, Part II
Posted: Jan 24, 2010 2:47 PM Reply


She really has a nasty habit of rubbing her a$$ in public!

In my Fashion Police opinion, with her lack of curves, she shouldn't wear this style dress.

Posted with a nice big picture of Nicole & Keith.


SM or anyone, I think this calls for a few of the BIG BEASTLY PICTURES WE ALL HAVE OF NOMOREFAN. You know the ones!
And we can post our very own FASHION POLICE OPINION on her and what they show!

Wouldn't that be only fair?

SkewerMistress said...

This figures nicely into why nomorefan is an idiot. A woman with curves should not wear this dress. Why would they with banded beading and pattern across the torso? Only a tall slender woman should wear this dress. Methinks this was posted in retaliation for the compliments on Just Jared. There are posts from people who say they don't like her but thinks she looked good.

Any one who wants to contribute a photo please leave a link in a comment. If need be I'll make them suitable for the blog. We'll see what we can come up with.

Anonymous said...

Sue wouldn't know what a tall slender woman should wear. She shops in the plus sizes.

satans_girl said...

"SkewerMistress said...
Susie Girl is the revamped name of new poster "satans girl". Apparently flyin is too tight with Christ to even post the word! BAHAHAHAHA!"


LOL. Is that she's calling me now? That's funny.

Thanks for posting this - I haven't been back to the Negative Thread since I called flyin out on the rules she is so fond of positng for everyone else that her & her friends don't seem to have to follow.

Actually, I didn't have an agenda with flyin until she started stalking me all over E trying to get me to fight with her.

I guess I really pushed them over edge huh? Wow.

You think they'll recover from this?

BAHAHAHAHAHA

Susie

Anonymous said...

#1 post of NOMOREFAN
nomorefan

Posts: 11,936
Registered: 6/23/06
Re: KEITH URBAN - THE NEGATIVE THREAD, Part II
Posted: Jan 24, 2010 2:47 PM Reply


She really has a nasty habit of rubbing her a$$ in public!

In my Fashion Police opinion, with her lack of curves, she shouldn't wear this style dress.


#2 post from NOMOREFAN

nomorefan

Posts: 11,936
Registered: 6/23/06
Re: KEITH URBAN - THE NEGATIVE THREAD, Part II
Posted: Jan 24, 2010 2:47 PM Reply


She really has a nasty habit of rubbing her a$$ in public!

In my Fashion Police opinion, with her lack of curves, she shouldn't wear this style dress.


#2 post from NOMOREFAN
nomorefan

Posts: 11,938
Registered: 6/23/06
Re: KEITH URBAN - THE NEGATIVE THREAD, Part II
Posted: Jan 25, 2010 8:52 AM in response to: innervoice Reply


From Lainey:

Best SAG Hair: Third Lip Kidman
She looked good, y’all, she did. She looked immobilised in the face, sure, but compared to how she’s been lately, she did look good. With her hair loose and wavy,
wearing a beautifully ornate Oscar de la Renta,


Granny was almost fresh. Like fresh out the freezer. So much better ginger red than she is as a blonde.



THE IDIOT JUST SHOWED HER fashion police SENSE
IS IN THE TOILET EVEN HER GOD LAINEY TOLD HER !

Did the two faced idiot forget what she said in her first thought to rush to the board and say something bad abt. Nicole? (when even scum lainey had to admit nicole looked wonderful?)

NOMOREFAN your pictures are coming. Hold on to your fashion police hat!

Post a Comment