July 31, 2009

Thank You Skeptics

Thanks to the skeptics, you are confirming everything we have ever thought about you. There's so much you can't see when that enormous hateful ego is in the way.

1. A Lesson In Journalism

http://www.theboot.com/2009/07/13/keith-urban-and-nicole-kidman-celebrate-sundays-first-year/

New Zealand website Stuff reports that the couple celebrated the milestone with a "little cake" at their home in Nashville last week.



Skeptics, do you see those quotation marks? Yes those pesky little things. That indicates Keith, if he ever in fact made any statement, said they had a cake. He did not say they were in Nashville. They could have been on the moon; but more likely than not, they were in New York.




2. A Lesson In PR


http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/8174132.stm

imahick: "This just plain proves so many things we've said all along about NK. She's arrogant. She thinks she is entitled to run the show because of her "status" and doesn't care that a child is involved."

Oh imahick what are we going to do with you? Can you not see this was an excerpt of a book Random House (think back to James Frey) is trying to sell you. A book that has a two ghostwriters, one possibly a translator, and that they are using Nicole for PR? That's the rub. The haters want us to believe anything about Kidman or Urban is PR lies coming directly from KUNK. But they can't see a real promotional strategy when it's right in front of their nose. Where are the excerpts released about the girl to sell the book? That's what this book is supposedly for, to tell Rubina's story. Instead, it's made to look like a page off Perez Hilton's website.

With quotes like "I found the American actress strange but then sometimes very charming." one cannot trust anything printed in this book as fact. Any skeptics want to tell us what they see wrong with that sentence? Yes, Nicole Kidman is not an American actress. True, she has US citizenship but when has she ever been labeled or called an American? Also, the claims about filming, from a production standpoint, make no sense. A "night waiver" or some equivalent could have been obtained for Rubina to work until morning. Kidman did not force her slave through the night for her own satisfaction. Nor would she be responsible for any skeptic-alleged child labor law violations. The entire mood and concept of the commercial would make no sense if filmed during the day. The skeptics want you to believe Kidman orchestrated the entire production because she's simply a bitch. Let's forget reality for a moment and the fact there's an Indian director and crew working on this commercial previous to Kidman's arrival. And let's focus on what's contradictory. One of the repetitive talking points is that Kidman loves attention. Needs it, craves it. So why would she be afraid of being seen in India? Why would she have "a dozen bodyguards" (a real joke). But Rubina's book is telling the whole truth. Correct?

The real truth is that a reprint on the BBC news site of a ghostwritten book, is still a reprint of a ghostwritten book. The blatant acceptance of anything even slightly negative and the dismissal of anything even slightly positive from the book shows you are consumed by hate. You cannot see clearly and you have blinders on, all of you. So you fail once again.




3.You Can Stand Under My Umbrella

While this isn't a recent event, it all ties in with today's theme. Time after time, the skeptics enjoy posting links to photos of Kidman during filming, standing beneath an umbrella on standby. What they have issue with is that Kidman isn't holding her umbrella. They see a crew member is doing it for her.

nomorefan: "More proof that Skank is a diva on the set of her movies. She can't even hold her own umbrella. Seriously! She's pathetic!"

Oh nomorefan, you have a lot to learn. It is commonplace for this to happen on set. In fact, why don't you take a look.


















Here is a snapshot of Clive Owen and Ulrich Thomsen on the set of 2009's "The International". Owen is an A-list star, but Thomsen is a working character actor. How is it possible both these men got such treatment? Is it because they are extreme divas and demanded it? Owen could possibly get away with it, but not a chance for Thomsen. We don't think either of them are divas or pathetic. But nomorefan's logic will tell you from this photo it is a fact they are.




4. Sometimes Emoticons Are The Best Response To Lies

nomorefan: "He will be writing more songs that have the sound of his life than the actual sound of a particular music genre. Gee, can you now figure out why he changed publishing companies?"

middlesea: "Here's the kicker: Keith was self-publishing with Babble On Music, and before that with his previous company, whose name I've forgotten just now. (Guitar Monkey Music, maybe?) Now he's going with Universal. Why?"

nomorefan: "Because his wife told him to."
















5. Happy Trails

Once again STS received a comment from an "anonymous" reader. It was not discarded but instead saved for a rainy day. Here it is in its entirety.


Are the defenders/fans of Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt on E! this protective of them that they start blogs and trash people posting negative things about them too? I've never seen such obsessions with an artist or entertainer. What's up with you people??? You spend hours on the internet copying posts from other forums, trash the posters, etc. Why not just ignore it and move on? You talk about skeptihaters being obsessed? What about you??? You're no different. You're obsessed with Keith Urban and Nicole Kidman, and trying to protect them. From what??? Who cares what people say about them? It's no different than what people say about other celebrities. What is it about Keith Urban and Nicole Kidman that has you so obsessed??

July 23, 2009 8:00 AM


The skeptics make it too easy, time after time. We know from several key points that this response has come from an E! hater.

Giveaway #1 - The Angelina Jolie/ Brad Pitt reference

Giveaway #2 - An "acceptance" of the skeptics and their behavior. The fans need to be the ones to walk away.

Giveaway #3 - Not contained in the comments but perhaps the most important point... this blog does not suffer from delusions. We do not believe anyone who isn't or wasn't a fan of Keith Urban would bother to respond to the blogs in this manner. Anyone against the truth we present must have an agenda. And the skeptics certainly have that.

So we leave you haters with a word of advice and a parting gift. Our words are this...

Please, if you have any faith in your cause stop yourself from leaving comments. Each time you respond, you have shot yourselves in the foot. Each time you have only given us further proof that you are know-nothing nincompoops who need to lie as much as breathe. But if you choose to continue to prove yourselves as phonies, rest assured STS will document it.

And now your gift. In the immortal words of Steely Dan...." It's over now, Drink your big Black Cow, and get out of here".





5 Comments:

Anonymous said...

"Are the defenders/fans of Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt on E! this protective of them that they start blogs and trash people posting negative things about them too? I've never seen such obsessions with an artist or entertainer. What's up with you people??? You spend hours on the internet copying posts from other forums, trash the posters, etc. Why not just ignore it and move on? You talk about skeptihaters being obsessed? What about you??? You're no different. You're obsessed with Keith Urban and Nicole Kidman, and trying to protect them. From what??? Who cares what people say about them? It's no different than what people say about other celebrities. What is it about Keith Urban and Nicole Kidman that has you so obsessed??

July 23, 2009 8:00 AM"


LOL!!! Dear Deluded Anon, everything you said about those of us who are no longer willing to let this nonsense go unchecked can be said about you. The difference is the skeptics have been obsessing over a couple they say they can't stomach for four freaking years! Who does that??? If you care to back off, I'm guessing we'll back off. Until then, we have a lot of ground to cover. You whackos have four years on us after all.

Sweet Thing said...

You did it again, SM! Of course the skeptics will never get through it because it's not written in comic book form and words tend to confuse them. Bhhwahaha

BTW, is Nicole an uneducated dummy or a really smart manipulator? The skeptics keep changing their story.

countrycat said...

Wow, you are really hitting em where it hurts SMistress. They are completely pathetic. The answers are so obvious and they're just running around like chickens with their heads cut off, still squawking away!

Anonymous said...

I'm not a fan of either of them and I don't I hate Keith Urban or Nicole Kidman. I really don't care what they do. Nor do I care what these skeptics do or say, I couldn't care less about them. But what I have seen and read from you here, is no different than what you accuse these skeptics of. You're on a message board spreading hate for people you don't even know, but you don't THINK you are. You ARE. You talk about these people making fools of themselves. Who cares? Let them. How does what they say affect YOU in any way? You're doing the exact same thing. If you're so above these people you're spreading your hate towards, you would have taken the high road. But, it's obvious you're not. You look just as foolish and hateful as they do.

SkewerMistress said...

If we take your comments on face value, then you don't have the full picture. The skeptics have always made it personal with anyone who knows they are blowhards. Have you ever been called a Kool-Aid drinker, pedophile lover, or a dumb bunny? Probably not.

But beyond the name-calling, this blog is pointing out the constant stream of lies and fundamental hypocrisy of the skeptics. They think they wrote their own ticket with the creation of the negative thread. No one can challenge them there. Ironically, it has made them more vulnerable to the pitfalls of an addiction to lying. You as someone who claims no vested interest either way, shouldn't have a problem with an expose of their deceit.

But that's if all of this is coming from who you say you are...

Post a Comment