Another Urban Myths Blog Scam: No One Reads Skewering The Skeptics

LMAO! Not only do fans read it but the skeptics do themselves!

mikki: abc, just want to be clear, I mean no disrespect to you. Let this person do her ranting and her obsessive lovefest on her own blog. Its harmless. No one reads it.
July 27, 2010 11:55 PM






Yes, that's page views in the thousands!

It's. Just. That. Easy.
BAHAHAHAHA!

Urban Myths Skeptics: We Know We're Lying But Leave Us Alone!

We've had more than a few comments and private messages as of late from readers who say don't these women know they know they're lying? Oh they do. Do they know how stupid they look? Oh they do! They know we know and they are so fixated on hate they don't care. Inept Senior Skeptic Maclen proclaimed that Keith wouldn't be recording another album. Ooops, he's been in the studio and writing with many established artists and songwriters. You know the ones that are embarrassed by him and hate his wife. Successful tour, and that next album on Capitol is coming but Urban Myths posts


"He's been SO busy recording and touring. What a joke."

It's nothing but deceitful and vindictive blogging.

Should we dear Urban Myths go over the skeptic lies that had Capitol dropping him, Capitol demanding he record in Nashville, or that Nicole Kidman is paying for the albums? BAHAHAHAHA!


Some key pieces of a conversation from the past few days between skeptics and two people who have some common sense just rip the Urban Myths blog to shreds. Poor skeptics.


JOY: I personally don't need DNA results or copies of her medical records to be satisfied. They have the right to their privacy ESPECIALLY about pregnancies & any other medical situations that they have. It's a very sensitive area for people no matter who you are. Just my little ole opinion.


mikki: Laura, NK has the choice of keeping her private life private. She choses not to. So she invites the questions and speculation based on her own actions. Sorry we don't take everything they say as the gospel truth as you fans do. And where is your evidence that its all true? To me, believing this whole fairytale is just as ridiculous.


hoosierlady: They have a right to nothing private, as long as they put themselves out there. We pay to be entertained, hence the words "media whores".

Laura: Really? Oh my God, I had no idea you could read her mind!

Jeez, you guys think you know everything.

I'd be open to considering the ideas you people have on this couple, if they weren't so ridiculous! Yes, the marriage is weird to me too, but I still have yet to hear/see any evidence (that's legit and/or MAKES SENSE!!) that they're everything you guys claim they are.



Laura: I never ONCE said that I KNOW this or that is true. If you read what I wrote, I said that I'd HOPE she loves him, and that nothing is wrong with him expressing his love for her. Whether he means it or doesn't, WHO KNOWS? NOT US. Like I said before.



abc: DITCH THE ATTITUDE, LAURA!!

Reread the title of this blog!!!

If you don't like what it's about, LEAVE!! Stop making it about the commenters.

and, for your information, not "EVERY" married couple fights ... maybe in your world ... MANY MANY MANY people get along nicely and agreeably ... but then, you do tend to generalise anyway so your opinion on marriage would no doubt fall out of the same mould.



Okay abc, we reread the title of the blog. URBAN MYTHS. That's exactly what that blog is. Myths, or rumors, or fantasies you all want to wallow in. Whatever you want to call them, at the end of the day the rumors you post as facts....from gossip sites, tabloids, crappy women's magazines or your own computer screen....is all you have. That's why your posts are identical from 5 years ago. A wedding from 4 years ago, a pregnancy from 2 years ago...the talk is all the same. Same stories, same rumors, same skeptic-created lies. WE ALL KNOW IT!

Please tell us exactly the day you thought Keith Urban and Nicole Kidman owed you an explanation for anything they do regarding their personal life.

hoosierlady get some help if you think celebrities owe you access to medical records, private photos, tax documents, contracts, and personal conversations.

The skeptics want all of Keith Urban and they're left with none.

Remind you of anyone? The next time a skeptic says something ridiculous (just wait a minute, it'll happen) say "Here we go again!"



P.S. Some of you skeptics might want to ask abc why she spent so much time at STS looking at the Skeptic Fashion Show Thread! The backstabbing and infighting continues!

Why The Skeptics And Haters Can't Just Go With It

Well the simple answer is they're hateful goons. But at STS we always go deeper than that to get the real story. It requires paying attention, having at least a basic understanding of the industries involved, and most importantly having both feet grounded in reality. You may not agree with the opinions here, but you'll always get the facts.

So....the skeptics AND haters are all in agreement....they're screwed.

maclen:Yes, you may be right...it may turn out to be a bigger role than originally reported. And I would imagine it is clearly because kidman may have nothing in line after this role!

hoosierlady: To change the subject, are we going to see every frame of the movie Just Go With It before it ever comes out?

Choice: This cameo appearance may all be part of her new agent's "Reinvention of Nicole" strategy. You know, to slowly re-introduce her to the public after a string of flops. If this film fails, Nicole can say that she was only in it for 10 seconds, so cannot be held to blame.

dumbfounded: Why in the HE!! did they choose her for that role?


mikki: Daily Mail has Kidman in yet another of her scenes in the film. Obviously she managed to increase her part from a two minute cameo to a small supporting role. Considering Aniston's string of flops is nearly as long as Kidman's this film won't be worth seeing either.



They jumped on the media bandwagon of "Nicole Kidman in cameo for Sandler flick", not paying attention to the major FACT that even the media said it was speculating. So why go with speculation? Well one, they are skeptics aren't they?! But two they could try and spin a cameo into "proof" that Nicole Kidman's career was dying. By the way Mary, if Urban Myths had proof in 2007, wouldn't you be done desperately trying to prove yourself time and time again? It has been 3 and half years. But we suppose starting out with a fake newswire item trying to pass off your hate as fact was a sign of things to come. We're all for interesting pictures in the sidebar but some substance would be nice to back it up.


Anywho, that leaves us with nothing to do but go back to the beginning, back to where the hint of Nicole's appearance started. That would be a Dan Patrick podcast where his friends Adam Sandler and a few other top comedians were talking sports and movies. Near the close of the show, Adam Sandler mentioned his new film, which at that point was in pre-production, would include Dan Patrick in a scene with Jennifer Aniston and Nicole Kidman. Let's look at that again.....Dan Patrick in a scene with Jennifer Aniston and Nicole Kidman. So because it was leaked that Patrick would have "a scene" (Sandler's exact words), he has after all done 5 cameos so far, somehow the media took that as Nicole Kidman is also in a cameo role. Why not Jennifer? Well stories had already been circulating that she and Sandler would be doing a comedy together. So naturally, Kidman showing up out of nowhere...must be a cameo! Well hold your horses media...and skeptics. Just because there were no whispers of Kidman's involvement earlier, or anyone else's in the part for that matter, doesn't mean you can make assumptions. And from Sandler's description, and the facts we now know (foil to romantic lead with husband included) Kidman's part was already bigger than a cameo in the pre-production shooting script. Oh yeah, Dave Matthews is another Sandler flick regular!


But assumptions are what the skeptics live off of and they always point in the negative direction. Not that a cameo is going in the negative direction. Again another industry fact the skeptics and haters are clueless or in denial of. A well-crafted comedic appearance can be a wonderful thing for an actor to have the chance to do. However, this ain't no cameo. No it's a fully fleshed role, the nemesis of the female romantic lead. Of course the skeptics will spin this every which way they can.....She's not the lead, She's too unattractive to play the part, she's too old, it won't be long before she's doing made-for-tv movies in Australia (yes we've read it all folks). However, as we said before an interesting character that has more quirks and more heightened comedy than Aniston's straight gal (that's comedy not sexuality Mimosa) role is probably a far more interesting thing to see any actor portray. Let's also not forget, even the most respected and revered actors who are of Nicole's generation have done the comedy/romcom. Cold Mountain co-star and 3-time Oscar nominee Philip Seymour Hoffman played second fiddle to Ben Stiller in Along Came Polly, also a Jennifer Aniston film. He's another versatile actor that can go from Along Came Polly, to a Mission: Impossible flick, to a film like Doubt with Meryl Streep. Oh there's another versatile Kidman co-star again. The links we keep making here!


See for yourself. Here's another set of photos from the comedy Just Go With It. We know the skeptics can't just go with it but who needs them! This time the cast is joined by comedian Nick Swardson who has some mightily impressed family members.


Minneapoils-St.Paul Star Tribune

More to be proud of ...

Minnesota's Nick Swardson is shooting a movie with Jennifer Aniston
and Nicole Kidman.

"Yes! I know! Even my Mom and I keep saying, 'Are you sure it's Nicole
Kidman and not Nicole Richie?'" said Rachel Swardson, his sister.
"Adam Sandler and Brooklyn Decker, cover of Sports Illustrated [swim
suit issue]. Super, super hottie. So I'm going to Hawaii to hang out
with Nick on set." The working title of the movie is "Just Got With
It."
























































































































We'll let the Urban Myths skeptics buy into cynic maclen's diarrhea-of-the-mouth dissertations. How long will it take hoosierlady to figure out the reason they are seeing all those shots of Nicole on set is because websites are purchasing them? We'll let nomorefan try to lead the pointless discussion on E! You can hear the sound of crickets over there. Wonder what's wrong?