The Truth Behind The Purchase

While the skeptics have been spreading lies about Keith Urban and Nicole Kidman, and in general showing a pure lack of common sense, a reader sent us a report on the Urbans' latest real estate purchase. In a shocking turn of events, the purchase is seen as a good thing and a boost to the NY economy. Nicole and Keith are welcome in NYC.



We'd also just like to say skeptics, we know why you are angry. It was just a short time ago that Ted Casablanca insinuated that Nicole Kidman had cash issues.


Ted C: Wondering where she got the cash to pay for all these "cosmetic enhancements"? That's a Vice so for another day, kiddies.



Some of you haters have tried to spread that rumor yourself, ever so often hinting she's desperate for money, including the hilarious fabrication that Nicole was selling information to the tabloids for money. That's of course when you aren't calling her a rich bitch, claiming that she's paying for Capitol to keep Keith or supporting his tour!

As for that other rumor that Tara tried to spread about Nicole running to NYC? Nicole desperate to join the cast of a Broadway play? Well if the skeptics knew their stuff they'd already know that those rumors of her retuning to the theater have been out there since her divorce. They'd also know that Nicole was asked in the past two years if would she like to go back. Her answer? Maybe, but not until her child was older.

What does a $10 million dollar purchase say readers?

BAHAHAHAHA!

P.S. Check out the sidebar for more of the truth behind Ted and Lainey!

E! Online Skeptics: Desperate To Win A Losing Battle

It's absolutely cringeworthy when you read something from a skeptic and you know they are lying through their teeth. Like this lie....

Mimosa:I don't feel guilty at all and I sure don't take this stuff seriously enough to bother with developing an agenda... We don't even have to work for it, since KUNKY serves up ridicule-worthy stuff to us on a silver platter.

or this lie...

Mimosa: And some posts are just for FUN....you know...since this is a gossip site, and it's supposed to be fun. The last I heard, it was OK for a poster to poke fun at a celebrity...or see things in a different way after certain events have shown them a different side. It's just a gossip site....it doesn't have to so rigid.


Because we know differently. When the shit hits the fan for the skeptics they get pissed. Especially Mimosa. Take a look at this recent outburst....


Mimosa: There is absolutely no excuse for a married woman with THREE KIDS to act like that. She's just trash. Sick, twisted trash.

Lainey is FOS. She should pick a side and stay on it.



Side? What side? Wasn't this entertainment? Just something for fun. That's what you've been telling us over and over. An innocent harmless pastime, making fun of a family and one half of the in-laws.

The skeptics are so transparent they don't know just HOW transparent they are.

So when E! skeptic "Tell me, does it get any better than this?" nomorefan pops up in the next few days with the BEST SKEPTIC NEWS EVER.... an old picture from the new cover of one of her "reliable sources"






















and an ode to a fellow Nashville-star obsessive, and she insists the skeptics "are on to something" or were "right all along", we already know that every single thing they post or make up at E! or Urban Myths or anywhere else is all part of an agenda. And....more importantly...what they don't post, discuss, or mention is an even a bigger giveaway. Deflection and ignorance are the tactics they've been unsuccessfully using as of late. It's all a failure in part because the Positive thread makes them look like morons, but also because what they are posting proves they have no grip on reality.


Remember when they posted and discussed everything? But time was not on their side. Their secrets got out. Who they don't know, what they've done as obsessed fans, lies they've made up, friendships they've destroyed. Pretty much all of it has come to light. Only the crazies remain. Five years and....KUNK wasn't supposed to stay together. Nicole wasn't supposed to get pregnant. Nicole wasn't supposed to fit in in Nashville. Keith wasn't supposed to be a superstar anymore. Nicole was supposed to be on the Z list and a Hollywood pariah. What do you talk about if you've been lying and wrong for 5 years?????

They know they are in trouble. If it wasn't for nomorefan on ridiculous tangents, mental case Jakra777, and Mimosa just being a nasty witch, the Awful Truth takeover by KUNK skeptics would have bought the farm already. They are down to one lifeless thread. Even at Urban Myths, post-maclen unmasking, it's been awfully quiet. She said she wouldn't be silenced but maclen's posts are few and far between.

It's all for a reason readers; they've been lying and scheming from Day One. They made it an obsession and decided themselves it was a battle against anybody with a differing opinion or God forbid, the truth. They went after everyone that didn't go along with the game plan.

Skeptics, where you are now is your own damn fault.

Lainey Is Just As Pathetic As E! Online Skeptic Nomorefan

E! Online Skeptic nomorefan has given us another great gem from fellow simpleton Lainey. Or rather she thinks her readers are simpletons. Maybe they are if they believe this one...

Granny green and red
Granny Freeze Nicole Kidman showed up at the Hollywood Foreign Press Association annual installation luncheon yesterday with red hair in a green dress and the bottom lip freshly inflated. The top lip however is missing its flaps. You know those two bits of flesh that ooze out from either side when she overdoes it with the needle and smiles too hard?

Hopefully by the time TIFF comes around, Gran will have plumped that sh-t properly. It is, after all, the 35th anniversary of the festival. And she’s coming back to promote what a lot of people are calling a very strong entry with Rabbit Hole in which she and Aaron Eckhart play grieving parents. So we could see her return to award season contention. Good. I have always, always loved Nicole as an actor. She’s a great actor. When she can use her face, she is wonderful to watch. It’s just...been such a long time.

Wrong. We're guessing your time as a fan ended when you got stories from jealous and vindictive Keith Urban skeptics. Those sources have been proven false time and time again.


Can't you just hear Lainey? She sounds exactly like nomorefan

See I'm right, I'm right. I posted a story on the heels of all the press Nicole is getting for Rabbit Hole at TIFF and I'm right, right?

She throws in an expletive for sass and false confidence but it doesn't make her any less wrong.

It's Time To Debunk The Rumors And The E! Online Skeptics

As it turns out, the Nicole Kidman / Tom Cruise rumor we recently confirmed as false isn't the only silly story making its way around the net. A few of them are trying to be spread by the E! Online Skeptics. Let's take a look and debunk them all.

Keith and Nicole are trying to get John Mayer and Jennifer Aniston back together - Clearly this is a case of Nicole worked with Jen, Keith's working with John, let's make a story. What happened to the rumor that Nicole hit it off with Jen in Hawaii? Well that's false because they already were friends. We've seen the backstage Oscar photos of them chatting in the wings. There were also rumors Aniston was having heart to hearts with Nicole about splitting with Brad Pitt, because Nicole knows what a high-profile breakup is like. Now it's not that that but heart to hearts about John. Oh gossip people get your story straight. Keith and Nicole's plan for John and Jen? It's "top secret" of course! LOL

Nicole and Russell Crowe want to remake Bonnie and Clyde - This came out of nowhere, but more than likely cooked up because the two have still never worked together. Highly improbable considering the magnitude of respectfully remaking a classic that changed cinema and the American ratings system. Also very unlikely because a remake already in the works starring Hilary Duff, has apparently stalled. Although Nicole would probably be more to Faye Dunaway's liking (she expressed dismay at Duff's casting), we still don't see this happening.


Lainey's rewriting of history - Self-explanatory really. If she only would admit to herself the truth.

Keith and Nicole are recording an album together - Allegedly Nicole will record the country songs Keith loves and Keith will record standards Nicole loves. Why "standards" for Nicole? We say no way to this, it's just too ridiculous.

Nicole and sister Antonia Kidman are pregnant at the same time - They just haven't announced it yet. Whatever.

Keith is gay; Keith is bisexual - Sure. After years of the skeptics saying what a horrible guy he is towards women now he's not a straight player. Whatever gets you though the night skeptics, and Ted!

And finally we have the latest rumor the skeptics are trying to sell us...

Keith Urban didn't show up at the Meadowlands in NJ for the Eagles show.

FALSE!

It's clear nomorefan and erniesmom are really trying to pull a fast one. A stadium show with 3 acts, which also means 3 stage setups, isn't like your normal show. Your first act is going to be on much earlier than normal. And we hear that some if not all the Eagles shows have an act on BEFORE Keith. Keith probably hit the stage around 5:30, 6, 6:30. That means the Eagles wouldn't perform until 9, 9:30. The reviewer, Tris McCall, didn't bother to find out the key information either

"Didn't arrive early enough to see Keith Urban…there wasn't any way to know what time the show started. We arrived around 7:20, thinking it was a 7pm showtime. Again, the stadium lets us down by not announcing the show time. All anyone would tell us, was that the doors opened at 4:30. I heard after we arrived that Keith Urban went on at 6. I would have liked to have seen him, but I didn't want to sit around before the show waiting 2 and a half, or even one and a half hours; but may 15-20 minutes, like when you go to a Broadway show."

NJ.com

Poor planning and a poor excuse from McCall. Even poorer are the skeptics....

nomorefan: A review from Mr. Nicole Kidman's first show with The Eagles. Was he even there? I guess he is an unknown. Count how many times you read his name.

erniesmom: What happened to that tour......3 cities cancelled and No Show Urban.


What stupidity for the No Brain skeptics. But you know they would have loved to have followed No Show around town if they could find the vehicle.

One more before we go....here's something that's not a rumor that we predicted months ago...the promotion by skeptics of Dierks Bentley's new album!

nomorefan: Oh Dierks is at my radio station promoting his new album this afternoon. Playing one of the new songs with Miranda and Jamey Johnson. I like what I hear!



BAHAHAHAHA! It's. Just. Too. Easy.

Lainey We Have A Problem

As predicted Lainey, your buddies the skeptics have posted your review of Nine. Well Pauline Kael you're not. But besides the problem we have with you coincidentally skewing the review to suit your anti-Kidman agenda, there's more than a few things that don't add up in your critique.

Forgot to mention that we saw Nine on the weekend.

Sure. It was horrible and starred your least favorite A-list actor and yet it slipped your mind.

They’re right. Wasn’t great.

Who is? We'd love names. The critics who proved in their reviews that they don't know the difference between 8 1/2 the film, and Nine the musical? The critics that thought Nine was a musical adaptation of the film? The critics who were too slow to figure out Kidman was not playing Italian icon Claudia Cardinale, as incorrectly reported in the press? The critics that said Nicole Kidman's Italian accent was terrible? Because the truth is she was playing a Swedish actress. Her character name, Claudia Jenssen, was all over the film including a life-size poster. The critics who say it was too long when in fact a large number of songs were excluded and each female characters segment was down to a few scenes and one song with the exception of Marion Cotillard.
Who?!

It was however great for Jacek who was nearly paralysed with want for Marion Cotillard. As far as he’s concerned, she is the only name on his Freebie 5, with Penelope Cruz, who was also sublime, a distant sixth.

That's wonderful for Jacek but totally irrelevant.

But the film, well, it’s terribly paced.

It's a film about a man's internal crisis. If you want something with a quick pace go buy a ticket for In The Loop. Heard of it?

And at times boring.

Why? You can't elaborate even a little?

And the Kate Hudson part is completely gratuitous and insulting.

Kate Hudson's part was a reworking of a different character from the musical. Her part is meant to be nothing more than an ego boost to Guido Contini. A representative of the many random women he beds when his mistress is unavailable. But more importantly, the end of Kate's scene was a turning point in the film. Personally I felt Kate as a singer...wonderful. Kate as a dancer....wonderful. Kate as an actress....cringe. Not that she can't act. It simply was that her modern vibe and presence felt completely out of place in 1960's Italy. I didn't buy she was a 60's woman on the verge of the sexual revolution. She was a woman who owned every episode of Sex and The City on DVD.

But insulting you say? You have a list permanently posted on your site of people you'd like to sleep with if you had the chance. We aren't buying your outrage.

And everyone I know who has seen it hates Nicole Kidman so much,

Straight out of the skeptic playbook ladies and gentleman....EVERYONE you know....

with the exception of my friend Dan (he loves musicals and has been chomping to see this movie for months) who turned it off after 30 minutes because, in his words, Nine is “f-cking unwatchable” so he couldn’t stick around long enough to witness her sucking.

Here's where you don't make any sense. Your friend Dan...he turned it off? So he received a DVD screener? Industry award voter? In any case if he has a DVD all he would need to do is use the FF button on his remote to see Kidman's big scene. However, Kidman appears within the first 5 minutes. In fact she is the very first woman to appear on screen in the film. And he probably saw the scene that's not in any of the trailers where Kidman and Daniel Day-Lewis are sitting in his hotel room. Why the need to fabricate stories?


Perhaps the biggest omission was you didn't actually comment ("sucking" doesn't count) on Kidman's singing or acting. But we will. Well she was wonderful. But what hasn't been said in any review out there is the transformation of her character within minutes. We see Claudia the diva moviestar who even on set lives up to public image. And then as she's waking through Italy with Guido her real self emerges, the real person she wants Guido to see her as but can't. As that happens she breaks into song. Simply stunning.



Once again Lainey Lui your true colors shine through, and they aren't pretty.