Skewering A Skeptic: Oh " So" Leery Is A Lying Nutcase

QUOTES FROM OH " SO" LEERY

E! Online Skeptic Threads


"Third, take a look at the people she sued. One was for stalking. The man had lunch with her. She went to see him at his office. All of a sudden he was presented with a subpoena for stalking."

-------------------------

"Sis gets told she can have the Cattle Stud as her own home.(What to be a breeder?) ((giggles))))))) My 6.5 mil house for what?? Instead Sis decides to go far away from Hagmaw so she don't have to do anything more."


--------------------------

"He has never been able to have children. He had any surgery!! He had been extremely ill as a child and it left him sterile. Now are we all on the same page here?

unless they had cloning done there's just no way. Nothing at all is there. Without getting to gross. The part's there but that's all."

----------------------------


"Sugarland was mentioned for AFTH but declined. Yes,opening for KU the excuse was she had throat problems but actually it was that their Nash and they're not going to do anything against the powers that be. He has been ostracized as much as he can be without making it to obvious. But he is. And money won't push those people around. They used them for they're sham and Nash don't forget!!!"


----------------------------



"I do not believe the church they had their production in was a working church. And the actor in priest's garb did not marry them.

Ok, let's talk turkey here. ( sorry for the pun) First Marienne went to Catholic Church every week while in Nash. So did KU, with her !!

Before Hagmaw!!! I know they were going in 2003, 2004, 2005 till Hagmaw got into the picture. You know the Church that Hagmaw stood in front of to show us she took the little one to Church on Christmas. Well, that church is in Franklin and that's where KU and Marienne went all the time Marienne was living in Nash."

-------------------------------


"Doesn't she have some red carpet thing for NINE? I thought she was staying here till KU starts touring in OZ.

Now I don't think he actually came back. I think that pic was taken a while ago.

All the equipt has to be checked out before the first concert on the 12th. I just checked out the Aria award show and saw that KU had his band there.

Now it seems strange that he would bring the whole band back to turn around and go back in a week. Something's weird. That's another reason that pic looks so strange.

Let's not forget photo shopping is Hagmaw's only talent!! (giggles))"

-----------------------------


"My great nephew was an exchange student for a year he was in Sydney I think. He would send pics and talk about how he loved it. Since I use to talk to KU very often I gave him some pointers on some phrases that are outlandish. Like your roose is loose in your upper paddock. We would laugh."

-------------------------------


"What about the award that she crashed with all her Echo fans. That was a record award last year I think it was. She was there even though KU did not look happy. Doesn't that count?"

--------------------------------


"Dollie was carried into Oz in the middle of the night. Suro left Oz when they came home. Of course Easter, well maybe that was a rent a kid, you know they had to have a kid to meet Grandpa Urban. So I guess this would be Suro's first trip to OZ!! I believe this to be a Freudian slip!! ((giggles))))"


"I think he's having some serious memory issues. Between her looking trashed and the pics staying where everyone can see them. And KU talking about Suro going to Oz for the first time. It's really getting weird !! ((giggles))"

---------------------------------

"I have to say it. KU can't have kids. Not any way shape or form. Not by injection or any other way well maybe cloning. ((giggles)))

She can't either b/c she's as barren as the desert use to be!!! Now that's the absolute truth. So either Sis did her a big favor getting pregnant by her boyfriend/soon to be husband or they went out of the country. But that child is not theirs!!!"

---------------------------------

"Now if you remember when TC showed Suri's BC it was all scratched and amended. It happens to a lot of BC.

But my contention is if TC can show Suri's BC why not Hagmaw and company. I guess there must be some fire under all that smoke.

The funny part of this is by the time that little one is ready to go to school no one will even care about any of it. In another year and we won't see that child again. Once she can talk she will not be in the public's eye. She'll be in a private school in Oz."

---------------------------------

"And our topic of conversation has thought nothing of bringing anyone to court she so desires to rake over the coals. Even to a person that was running for Pres of this USA. She stripped him of that chance like it was nothing why? b/c she can!!!!!!"

"Did I say leaked, no I was told. And told by the person that we're talking about right now. I said nothing about a vasectomy. And yes, I am saying it b/c it's true. I never signed a confidentiality clause nor have I ever tried to get money that isn't mine. So this is very different. I am saying this b/c I'm sick of the lies. I'm sick of the phoney crap. And I'm disgusted at what KU has done to his family and friends. I mean real friends. So now matie without talking about anything that would hurt anyone but these two I am at war!!!!!

This format gives me the opportunity to tell it like it is !!!! I really am not the least bit concerned as to whether anyone believes me or not. I know what is true and so do the KUNKS, that's my satisfaction!!"


--------------------------------

Oh KM1, No I'm sorry I'm a little to old for KU! ((giggles)) But we have spoken very often about things that are very personal. Sometimes an old timer like me is easy to talk to.

Look KM1, for years I have been a champion of KU!! I believed he was coerced into this mess. Which I have to tell you that part is true. In the beginning. He did try everything to get out of it. Even to turn up drunk as a skunk on his wedding day. And to say he was not affiliated with any religious organization. He did try.

When he decided it was easier to take her money and do what she wanted I became very disappointed in him. When he turned his back on his friends that stuck by him through this and did everything possible to help him. Then I have to say there's no loyalty any longer. To receive loyalty you must give it. He stopped giving so now I'm not giving!!

I'm a little fish in a big sea. If I were to go on a rampage all over the place it would be like spitting in the wind. I can't touch them. But I can talk in this format. I can say what the truth is and know in my heart the KUNKS read this. So this is the only opportunity afforded me to say what I have to say.

-------------------------------


"If the KUNKS would like to take it up with me, well my dear KU knows exactly where I am !!!

If I hear KU touting about that Baptism that wasn't, I will blow him out of the water from Monkeyville to facebook. I'm tired of his stupidity!!!"


-------------------------------

"The funny thing is, for along time now I have said things on this board and then they come to light."


PLEASE TELL US BEFORE THEY TAKE YOU AWAY OH " SO" LEERY....WHAT TRUTHS HAVE YOU SHARED?

Some Food For Thought

We'd like to take this opportunity to talk about the serious side of the skeptics. At times, this blog gives us an opportunity to laugh at some of the silly and dumb things these fools say they believe. But in reality, it can all turn very ugly.

We know of women who have tried to get inside information from crew members at shows. We know of women who have made trips to find where Keith Urban lives. We know of women who have made up entire conversations/relationships with Urban, and then posted them to other skeptics. We know women who think they are soul mates with Keith. There's daily messages, clearly labeled and dated, so they think he's sure to see them. We know there are women fixated on Urban's wife for all the wrong reasons. We know there are women that would follow Keith Urban to the ends of the earth. And we know why these women have a fondness for Amanda....she was one of them.


These whackjobs somehow always find a way to each other. This blogger wasn't around in the early days but we've been caught up to speed. I'm sure some readers can remember Crazy Amanda. Buck50 and Crazy Amanda are one in the same. We've been told Amanda used to post on Keith Urban message boards and pretend to be his lover. She lived in Nashville so she was able to get access to him and later present a story full of lies to get a big fat check. But you see, if the skeptics we hear from today were 20 years younger and could have done what Amanda did, they would have. It's why they are joining other young and new country male artist fanclubs. Easier access that way when they're still climbing that career ladder. No, for them no one compares to Keith Urban but it's a fantasy life they are after and damn anyone that tries to get in the way. Read the early posts of the Jimmy Wayne thread. A woman who chose some other artists to follow a little to closely became their good buddy. Why? Because, as KU has said, cliches are cliches for a reason. Birds of a feather...Peas in a pod...


But how bad can it get? Ask Gary Allan. He was unfortunate enough to have a female fan who went over the edge. She stalked him and even trashed his house. The worst part is she put all the blame on him. In her mind Gary was obsessed with her. Gary was the one who ruined her life. Is putting the blame on someone else sounding familiar readers? In her laundry list of accusations she's claimed that Allan wrote songs about her, emailed her incessantly, and bugged her phone. She also accused Allan of using drugs, having affairs with underage women, and of having phone sex with her on several occasions. Would it shock you to know she admitted Allan wasn't the first person to request a restraining order on her? Would it shock you to know she was obsessed with an Allan band member and then moved onto the singer? We don't think so.

Sometimes, there's nothing like a visual to get your point across. Thanks to a reader sending us a link, we have video of Walker on a rampage where she trashed Allan's property.



Now of course we can't talk about this without including Nicole Kidman. Unfortunately she's had her fair share of stalkers and that's not including Jamie Fawcett. We bring this up because the skeptics have an outrageous way of arguing in favor of stalking and in their minds they are defending themselves.

Kidman used to live in L.A. with her two oldest children. During that time she received some disturbing letters from a man who wanted to "tutor" them. He went to her house numerous times bringing her flowers. She had to go to court to get a restraining order put on him. What does he do? Sues Kidman, journalists, and various media groups for $200 million dollars on the grounds of libel. He said his reputation was ruined for being called a stalker.

That's L.A. But now, it's not simply crazy fans that celebrities need to watch out for. Ask Nicole Richie. She was recently granted a restraining order against two L.A. paps because they do exactly what the skeptics say they don't do. They stalked her. They followed her day after day in her vehicle driving around L.A. They caused a car accident which they shamelessly filmed after impact. They continued to follow her after that incident. They camped outside her home and yelled at her when she left to get her to respond on camera. If this isn't the definition of stalking we don't know what is.

So we come back to the skeptics. When Nicole Kidman was back in L.A. temporarily, they had some not-so-helpful suggestions. If she doesn't want to be followed and photographed don't leave the house. If she doesn't want to be followed and photographed don't go to the same place twice. If she doesn't want to be photographed too bad, the photographers are just "doing their job". The problem is that's irrelevant when paps are watching you sunup to sundown. Not to mention the next day they say Kidman personally hired them. Make no mistake, the skeptics condone this outrageous behavior.


This will be the last blog until after Thanksgiving weekend. Just something to think about, and we encourage you if you have information regarding anything disturbing aimed at the Urbans to please contact the proper channels. Please note, we are not trying to cause panic or insinuate anything is being planned. However, a handful of readers over the past 6 or so months have asked that this be discussed. The topic has been put off long enough and this blog feels it's a good idea to address the dark side of things sooner than later.


With that out of the way, let's enjoy the holiday season and all that is to come.


HAPPY THANKSGIVING!

Pathetic!

nomorefan: "He was up against two opening acts . . . fair? Not at all, but what did you expect when it was fans voting on the awards? I was unaware of that. Why wasn't Brad, Kenny or George up against him? I bet there is smoke coming from fingers in Monkeyville."

Not fair???? Go shed a tear somewhere else. Since when do you care about fair? BAHAHAHAHA! For your uninformed information AMA nominations are determined through the industry, SoundScan and Nielsens, not by a fan voting 5,000 times. But then again, you yourself said you would have voted had you known you could.

Some questions though...Are you admitting Keith has more fans? Or more loyal fans? And by the way Darius is big fan of Keith and wants to write with him. One more time readers....BAHAHAHA!

neverland47: "My suspicion is that the common denominator in the Gloriana and Urban wins was Taylor Swift fans."


Why? Why would Taylor's fans automatically vote for Urban? Wasn't it the skeptics claim that Taylor fans and other opening acts didn't give a crap about him? They would go see the opening set and then leave in droves? Why would they then bother to vote for Keith just because?

neverland47:"I was surprised Gloriana won. I was surprised Keith Urban won. I call it the Taylor Swift factor."


There are many consumers that don't like Lady Gaga despite her media saturation. More likely Gloriana's win is due to the American Idol/Dancing With The Stars Non-Vote. Everyone assumes Gaga will win so fans don't vote. Their category was separate from the rest of the others. Voting was available until right before the awards telecast. They had ample time and did nothing.



As a reminder let's hear some fellow country artists talk about Keith Urban.

Taylor Swift

Zac Brown

Jason Aldean

Lady Antebellum



We aren't even going to bother addressing the substance abuse rumors started by the skeptics over an innocent quote about Christmas vacation. It's nothing more than a sick and twisted game the haters are playing.

PATHETIC SKEPTICS! PATHETIC!

Congratulations Keith!

AMERICAN MUSIC AWARD'S
FAVORITE MALE COUNTRY ARTIST

Nomorefan Has No Clothes!

Yes readers we all remember that story we were read as a child. Well this is a modern twist on that tale. You see day in and day out Grand Poobah nomorefan thinks she has something on Keith Urban and Nicole Kidman. And yet every day she comes up short. Well today is a disaster of grand proportions for nomorefan.


First there's the secret podcast. Nomorefan on November 17, posted this on the E! Negative thread.

nomorefan: "From Hollywood . . . Third Lip is suing the plastic surgeon for the third lip he gave her since she has been recently bashed in the media. The cause for the sudden disappearance on the red carpet . . . the double-sided tape didn't hold and something popped out."

Then leaving her cohorts high and dry as usual with no source or link she posted this

"The link probably won't be available until tomorrow. It is a live report - not an article.

ETA - the link would be about the lawsuit. Another witness that injected during this report said there was actually some TV coverage on wardrobe malfunction, but didn't say where they saw this. This has no affiliation with country music - all Hollywood.

The report is always given live, but a podcast of a generic version of the report is posted on the website the following day. Does that make sense? I'm gringing at giving out the site because this guy will get beaten up with emails for sure."



So let's rip her post to shreds.

It's November 21, and still no "report". We don't care where she got her story from...Jimmy Carter, Ryan Seacrest, Ted Casablanca, whoever. The truth is she easily could have made it up. But with or without a link the story is still a lie and anyone with common sense can see that. Let's for a moment go with the theory that Kidman did have surgery and she is suing a doctor. That lawsuit would be public knowledge. It's common knowledge she's said she hasn't had any surgery so that immediately would be a massive mistake. Again, still going with the theory that nomorefan's story is true why has absolutely no one...not a single blog or website, Google alert, twitter post....said anything about it. An A-list star with botched plastic surgery suing the evil doctor, that's celebrity gossip gold!!! Look how much was made of Lisa Marie Presley and where is she on the celebrity totem pole?

But let's get back to reality. Comparing pictures from Kidman you can see she's older. But she still has that indent under her nose. She still has that crease on her right side of her face that comes out when she smiles. She has some age lines that most women over 40 have. Her teeth haven't undergone massive changes. Her lips are still the same shape and aren't perfectly straight under the top lip when she gives a big smile. She lost that baby fat in her face long ago and the alleged cheek implants are actually a family trait, both her and her sister have them.


And yet again yesterday nomorefan pulled out this gem.

"I was flipping through the mag while waiting in line this afternoon, and there in the Table of Contents was a pic of Third Lip with Silicone and it said, "Did Nicole Get A B@@b Job?" I think the article was in the page 50 range - it is almost a centerfold spread. In big huge letters going across the top of the two pages "DID NICOLE GET A B@@B JOB?" There was a before and after of her. I think the before was just before she met Mr. Nicole Kidman. She was in a black strapless gown, and her b@@bs didn't look anything like the CMA picture. Then even better yet - they had about four or five pictures along the bottom dating back to the days of Tom. WOW - do you see the changes, and plastic surgeons agree - she has done everything the skeptics have speculated. Check it out! "

No, nomorefan no thanks. Just because you aren't the only one to speculate and/or lie doesn't mean you're right. In fact InTouch, which is just a glossier version of Star or National Enquirer, wouldn't even bother to do a story on this unless they were willing to say Yes Kidman had surgery. Otherwise why bother? InTouch is a gossip rag just like all the others. And just like all the others they manipulate things to make them look true. Just like you do. How much do you want to bet they didn't include this 1990's photo we posted in the last blog?



















We are certain without bothering to look at your stupid little "article" that InTouch purposefully and deliberately used photos where Kidman looked as small as possible. Then they padded their story with plastic surgeons/"experts" willing to say whatever the mag wanted. You do realize these surgeons were compensated don't you? You do realize doctors like that aren't worth the piece of paper their medical degree is printed on? Would you be willing to put yourself in the hands of doctor who speculates on the medical history of non-patients? We'd bet not. But then again your philosophy has always been believe what I say, not what I really do.



Now onto the second part of nomorefan's lies.

"The cause for the sudden disappearance on the red carpet . . . the double-sided tape didn't hold and something popped out."

There was no sudden disappearance. Proof? Pictures and video and commentary all well documented. We're not surprised nomorefan bought into the stupid story. She'll post and say she believes anything to try and be right. It's a pity for her she fails every time.

Keith and Nicole were seen arriving in their Bentley. MusicCitytv.com was streaming the event live and they were seen on camera.

Then hundreds of pictures were taken of them as arrivals on the carpet. In fact they were even labeled as such

You can see those HERE

Now here's where nomorefan wants to think she's right. According to the rumor Kidman ran and Urban didn't know were to find her. Going out of his mind because he's just so co-dependent he was saying "Where is she, where is she?". Kidman was hiding out because her fake boobies were malfunctioning and she didn't want to answer questions about UNIFEM. Ahhh that's nomorefan's version.

Well readers there's video to prove Kidman was with Urban. She didn't bolt or go into hiding. In fact she even talked to one of the interviewers. Oh skeptics you are just going to hate this!







No one believes nomorefan's crock of manure. In fact one site which posted the rumor got some pretty choice comments. This one was our favorite

"congratulations for your imagination. the fakest story I have ever read in my whole life."





Now of course nomorefan isn't the only pathological liar. These blogs wouldn't be the same without mentioning maclen. He's just as gullible as nomorefan when it comes to internet gossip.

Here's what he said:


"**BREAKING NEWS**

ATTENTION! THE BIG NEWS COMING FROM KIDMAN'S TONIGHT SHOW WITH CONAN OBRIAN APPEARANCE LAST NIGHT IS...

http://www.instyle.co.uk/news/celeb-hair-nicole-kidman-goes-back-to-blonde-20-11-09?destination=news

Celeb hair: Nicole Kidman goes back to blonde

"Nicole Kidman ditches red and goes back to blonde on US chat show"


Crikey, my first thought is, "Boy, what breed of kidman's alpacas did they shave down to make that matted rag she is wearing?!"


He seems to think he has breaking news??? BAHHAHAHAHA!

It's too bad Kidman had red hair yesterday. Here's a screenshot of the show.














Conan O'Brien is known for his red hair. Kidman has red hair in the photo. What genius thought she changed her hair color?

And of course the morons got her clothes wrong too. She didn't go backless. There was clearly flesh-tone material on the back of her. Sorry to do this to you liars. Okay no we're not!!! How's this photo for you, Taralea? We're having an extremely hard time finding the "bony back" you said you saw. Maybe it's time for a trip to the optometrist!













And to further show maclen's ignorance he is now comparing performances of "Unusual Way", as if he actually could. Let's educate maclen. "Unusual Way" is a staple at musical theater auditions. It has been traditionally sung in the very high register. But Rob Marshall took this song from a different angle and we quite like what we've heard. Kidman sounds completely different than she did in Moulin Rouge. She's no longer the young ingenue of Satine and has become this mature worldly woman of Claudia.




The song could be sung by any woman of any age in love. But this interpretation informs the character so much more and separates her; it gives her her own identity away from celebrity, away from the other women in Guido's life. Marshall wanted to give the song "more weight and more poignancy" and it works. He is making this musical his own which is what a director worth his salt should do. He wanted those actors in those specific parts and wanted what they could bring. Look it up maclen if you don't believe us. In fact Kate Hudson's number was written specifically for the movie. Film and theater are two different mediums which is why we cringe when fans of one negate the other. A book cannot be the same as a film. A film cannot be the same as a play. A play cannot be the same as a musical interpretation.


One more thing for Urban Myths. ABC has their own Nine webpage.


http://abc.go.com/site/nine-movie


That is why Kidman and others are so involved in the promotion on their network....the ads, Dancing With The Stars. At the very least, Kidman has more of a reason to be on The American Music Awards. Her husband is nominated and performing. Kate Hudson is there solely to promote!


And The Joke Of The Day Award goes to Mimosa, E! skeptic poster with 7,178 posts

"I know I'm not wasting time or money on anything with Nicole Kidman in it."

BAHAHAHAHA!


PUT SOME REAL CLOTHES ON SKEPTICS! YOU'RE EMBARRASSING YOURSELVES!

Nail. Head.

We have so much material that will get the skeptics hopping mad, STS is just going to throw it all out there. Enjoy!

--------------------------------------
Hey skeptics, ever heard of a mild food allergy? Also have you ever heard of white strawberries, the kind people with a strawberry allergy can eat? They are much more commonly used in Europe.
















------------------------------------



nomorefan's cyberspace pal Jimmy Carter, the one who posted the infamous "Is Keith Still A Guy" video twittered that Keith Urban might have been the one to take EOTY this year. Did nmf share that with the group? NO!

And speaking of nomorefan have you noticed her obsession with fan clubs and fan parties? And not just any fan clubs but fan clubs of male artists. The latest is Jack Ingram. Before it was Dierks Bentley, then Jake Owen. She'll praise female artists but only when it suits her. She's really all about the males. Let us go back to when Oh "so" Leery and another skeptic said they didn't like Taylor Swift because she was acting too much like "The Skank" Nicole Kidman Which skeptics defended Taylor? None. Not even nomorefan who in months previous was all into Swift and her bigger and better than Urban talent. Get a clue nomorefan and the rest of you. You aren't pulling over anything on anyone.

Nomorefan also think she's objective when it comes to Keith's music. It doesn't offer enough variety of sounds. That's why she's going to a Brad Paisley concert where the focus is guitar, guitar, and more guitar. And somehow she's forgotten about the marching bands, celtic sounds, the chorus before God Made Woman, the piano he played for Tonight I Wanna Cray and Celebration, the Spanish influence on Tu Compania, and the fresh island sound of Why It Feels So Long. You can't find more variety of sound than in Keith Urban's pre-show music piped into the arenas either. nomorefan, ask Zac Brown how he feels about Keith Urban. You are an idiot.

---------------------------------------
The Brad Factor: The skeptics somehow have got themselves believing Keith is getting awards because of Brad. Oh it goes both ways skeptics. The song wouldn't have been the success that it was without Keith. Brad didn't write the song. In fact it was sent to him and initially he turned it down. Without the duet interplay the song wouldn't be half of what it was. Urban put in as much effort as Paisley did for the video. They both promoted it with performaces at the award shows. We don't believe the bs Keith got half an award, because that means Paisley only got half of one too. What's the only hit single from Play? "Start A Band".

------------------------------------

The alleged Boob Job

Sorry skeptics but here's a pic from the 90's before you said she had work done (see Tom on the left). Same chest in a dress that gives her something more.



















----------------------------------

Martina McBride gave a quick interview in People Magazine's Country Edition where she said her favorite movie of all time is....Moulin Rouge. "It always inspires me," she said. She also wants to go back to Italy, the country where Keith and Nicole also went on vacation and the skeptics were pissed about it.

In that same magazine Keith was featured in a piece called "10 Songs That Changed My Life".

---------------------------------------

Keith Urban is working on a possible song with John Mayer.

---------------------------------------

Nicole's career is dead except that she'll be on Oprah Wednesday, Conan O'Brien Thursday, and will be a guest presenter at the CNN Heroes Gala. She was also a guest at the Vogue Fund Fashion Awards, which encourages young talent in the design field.

And as if some of the skeptics are pretending they don't already know The Danish Girl is a go, it is with Gwyneth Paltrow replacing Charlize Theron.


----------------------------------------

The skeptics say the Nine cast hated Nicole Kidman? Nicole and Keith were spotted seeing new release Precious with castmate Kate Hudson and her boyfriend.

Screen legend Sophia Loren told an interviewer what a great time everyone had on set. Sunday was with Nicole and she as especially happy when Keith came to visit the set. They all cried at the end of filming because they had become such a family.

------------------------------------------

Some sales figures for the skeptics. Think Keith is the only one who has seen a drop in sales? Think again.

Tim McGraw's Southern Voice hit #1 with a total of 136,574 copies sold. His previous Let It Go sold over 350,000 the first week.

Carrie Underwood's Play On sold 318,000 copies the first week as opposed to Carnival Ride's 527,000

Brad Paisley sold 197,151 units of 5th Gear in the first week, while his latest release dropped to around 129,000 copies.

All Number One's of Nothing, huh nomorefan?

-----------------------------------------

The talk about Nicole's diaries. Some of the skeptics lied and said she never had any diaries and she's making it all up for publicity. Oh skeptics what you would pay to know just a little of the truth before you speak. Kidman has spoken about this before. Years before. In fact it's probably how the gossip rag New Idea got inspiration to "create" one for her on the set of Australia. Here's just one of the quotes:


From November 27, 2007

"I've kept a diary on this film [Margot At The Wedding]. I've kept one on and off since I was about 10."

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1285/is_10_37/ai_n24252513/pg_3/


---------------------------------------

Look who got prominent billing for the Stagecoach Fest 2010?




















-------------------------------------------

The skeptics think Nicole Kidman can't get hired unless she produces films herself. Technically she's been just one of the producers, so she still has to get others to work with her and fund the projects. But in any case here's a confirmation Kidman was going to co-star wit Twilight sensation Robert Pattinson, but the dates couldn't be worked out.



Add Pattinson to the long list of fellow actors Kidman has praised over the years, proving the skeptics are liars once again.


--------------------------------------

The "inebriated" picture. Ahhh the skeptics are tricky ones aren't they. A single pic of the set was posted on Urban Myths, and a cropped one at that. The same one on the E! negative thread. Once again we say how convenient. This pic, one left out by the skeptics seems to call into question the "media"'s take on things.



















http://www.celebrity-gossip.net/celebrity_gallery/image_full/218818/

So what do we see here? Urban, not even looking at his wife walking to the apartment, is more than likely dealing with NY paps. As the numerous pics of the family have come out this week, one thing is obvious....the locals are getting in tight with the cameras. These pics were at night and there's those bright lights that Kidman is not fond of. Does Nicole's facial expressions indicate she's drunk? No. Does she look like she's about to fall or stumble over her own legs as she walks? No. Does it shock anyone that no video was released of an A-list star caught drunk? Does it shock anyone that only 3 pics were taken of a supposedly drunk star? No, because this "drunk story" is a supposition on the part of the internet bloggers and websites.

Two more things worthy of comment. It's the skeptics favorite thing to declare pics "staged" and that Kidman is forced to hire paps in order to look relevant and Keith just goes along with it. So does this scenario sound plausible to you: Kidman gets drunk and everyone forgets to call off the paps that are waiting outside the building, the paps they always hire. The building that had paps waiting there several years ago when Kelly Ripa lived there. The actress/co-host has made the comment many times that when she used to live in the building the paps would all lower their lenses when they saw it was her coming and not Kidman. So why would pre-hired, pre-planned paps need to hang outside a building for hours pretending to wait for their client when they could be making money elsewhere. Yes, it doesn't make sense to me either.

And of course there's maclen. Maclen is now not only the idiot savant and an inept team of one, but the King of Exaggeration. Please finish your drink before you read this; we don't want any spewing on your computers!

maclen: "So, the "IMPLOSION" of kidman has now officially entered the "paris hilton...lindsey lohan...britney spears" level! Paps...clean those lens...and ready those camera's for the inevitable "crotch shots!"

BAHAHHAHAHA! Maclen you are a moron of massive proportions.

----------------------------------

Tim McGraw's recent statement in an interview:

"Faith saved my life in a lot of ways. From myself more than anything. I can go down a dark road sometimes. When you're not feeling good about yourself, and she pulls me out. My wife makes me a better man."

-----------------------------------

Dierks Bentley's recent comments in an interview:

BEHIND THE LYRICS: DIERKS BENTLEY REVEALS THE MUSE BEHIND HIS SEXY NEW SINGLE - WIFE CASSIDY


Dierks Bentley tells the December issue of PEOPLE Country that the inspiration behind his sexy new single, “I Wanna Make You Close Your Eyes”, is Cassidy, his wife of nearly 4 years with whom he has a daughter, Evie, 1. Writing the love song with producer pal Brett Beavers started off as a laughing matter. “We had a lot of fun seeing how far we could go,” Bentley says about writing the come-hither lines. But when the joking stopped, the real emotion poured through. “I thought about my wife, coming off the road and being wiped out, and how there’s no better feeling in the world than lying sideways on a couch, just resting on her and feeling her breathe…She’s a huge inspiration for songs"

http://www.todayscountrymag.com/people1112.htm


-------------------------------

The Capitol Nashville CMA After-Party














And apparently Urban was having such a good time, he and Kings of Leon band member Caleb Followill couldn't stop laughing over a joke.

--------------------------------

Kidman is on another cover, December's Ladies Home Journal. Here are some great quotes the skeptics are purposefully ignoring.


“There are certain limitations to my career because I’m based here [Nashville]. And that’s cool. Keith has enormous ambitions, which I support. His tours and albums are much bigger than what I’m doing right now,”

"I think that we're in the world to connect. Because that's what you're left with. You're not left with your houses or awards or money, you're left with the people that you built relationships with."

She wants to help start a hotline for abused women. "It's so they'll have a place to call. A lot of women are so terrified; they'll go to the police or court and don't win. We can set up shelters and raise money," says Kidman. "I'm constantly trying to find new ways to give back," she adds. "Women are nurturers. There's so much we can do with the power of our feelings, the power of our sensitivity."

"Keith and I have a very honest, profound marriage, which we both contribute to every day," she says. "We have a phrase, 'Does this contribute to the good of our union?' Because that's what's most important." She smiles. "I love being in love. I believe in the power of love, the way it can heal. The more you keep choosing it -- because there are times when you can choose to be angry at the person or to love him -- the more it nourishes a family."

-------------------------------------

And lastly your skeptic Joke of The Week award goes to hit n run for this completely stupid statement. After traveling from Nashville to Chicago and then to New York with the family, all to cover work-related commitments, this is what she says about Kidman

Posts: 3,066
Registered: 8/4/08
Re: Keith and Nicole: Dissecting Their Charts
Posted: Nov 16, 2009 11:05 AM in response to: flyin

"I would bet that she and Sunday live in NY."


BAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!

Well, Well, Well

Media manipulation has struck again. Nicole Kidman, during a press junket for Nine, revealed to Access Hollywood that UK GQ did in fact alter the context of her statements about fetishes, marriage and relationships. Those comments were made in reference to her films and not at all to her personal life.

When reading those words again

"I've explored obsession. I've explored loss and love in terms of being in a grief-stricken place, I've explored strange sexual fetish stuff.I've explored the mundane aspect of marriage and monogamy."

those of us knowledgeable enough can point to the exact films she's referring to.

Rabbit Hole, Birth, Fur, Eyes Wide Shut, Birthday Girl, To Die For

STS wants to take this opportunity to express regret for not following our instincts on this one. Initially we felt this quote had to be about her career and that was echoed by other fans on other sites.

This blog did not follow through and state our true feelings for several reasons....

1) Nicole Kidman is free to speak or not speak about whatever she wants in an interview. As a fan of her films which sometimes cover tenuous ground, her choosing to reveal personal details would not shock us or disappoint us. It is her choice.

2) There was no confirmation or denial from anyone that the context was altered until now. Frankly we are disappointed that an established magazine and journalist would take such tactics that are of gossip blog level. Lesson learned on our part!

3) STS did not want to escalate the number of hate comments we were receiving prior to the article coming out. At the time it was an issue but it will be no longer. Haters will not have any control over the content of this blog.

Video of the informative interview is on the right hand side in 2 segments. Even if you aren't interested in the magazine controversy, Kidman is very engaging, talking about filming Nine, Keith, and singing in general. A thank you to Maria Menounos for conducting a great interview that also gets the record straight.

http://www.accesshollywood.com/_article_25700


Always go with your gut!

And if you haven't already please check out the open letter below that you might have missed. It's been a busy week, with an extravaganza to come that will hit the skeptics where it hurts.

Dear Lainey,

It has come to our attention through your friends that you are peeved. Apparently a majority of the HuffPo readership that took a poll don't believe Nicole Kidman has had plastic surgery on her lips.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/13/nicole-kidman-has-freakis_n_356953.html



In fact, let's review your words, shall we?

"How about this feature in the Huffington Post (thanks Elise and Brooke!) on Granny Freeze and Third Lip. There’s a poll asking readers about Third Lip. Would you believe that a majority of respondents don’t believe that Third Lip exists? That Granny Freeze hasn’t had any work…?

Oh really???

Are they blind?

Have a look at Third Lip. Third Lip is slapping you in the face. And still the MiniVan Majority cannot see it, cannot accept it. People are DUMB."

Yes Lainey Lui, some people are dumb. Dumb enough not see the truth while they are patting themselves on the back for a bogus article. I think you'd be very surprised to find out exactly what people do and don't believe at Lainey Gossip. Oh...except...that's right, you don't allow comments of any kind on your website. We know exactly why that is. But while you rack in the dough with your little "stories", the bigger question is when will your conscience kick in? We don't expect it to be anytime soon.

As your friends from Urban Myths and E! Online keep feeding you false information, keep in mind The Majority isn't as dumb as you think we are. And if there comes a time when hating some other A-List actress is more profitable and the skeptics can't count on you anymore, they won't be your friends anymore either.

Love,
Internet Users With Brains

The "E" In EOTY Stands For....

Economics and Empathy.

Never before has an EOTY win elicited so much backlash. Why? Well because Taylor Swift as talented as she is, did not deserve the award. Youth has nothing to do with it. Only one headlining tour under your belt has nothing to do with it.

Let's work our way backwards to see what does matter.

Taylor Swift was also nominated for Female Vocalist Of The Year. Other women in the category were artists known for their vocal prowess like Martina McBride. In fact, McBride is nominated practically every year and has only won 3 times. No one in their right mind could say that Taylor Swift is a better singer or even on par with Martina and the other nominees. It's not just the quality of her voice. You may or may not think it's pleasant (see Kenny Chesney), but she cannot sing in tune live. And yet she won. Can you think of a single act that has won EOTY that cannot sing live? Even Shania Twain whose abilities were questioned and proven legitimate didn't win until the rumors were put to rest. So the next line of thinking is....if Taylor Swift isn't up to par with her female colleagues how could she possibly be a candidate for EOTY? If you have any doubts, her live performances at the CMA's proved she has some work to do. Would this be acceptable from a 30 year old artist? No way Jose.

Then there's the Kanye West factor. The empathy vote. It cannot be denied it didn't get her some sympathy. STS believes it's fine to show your support for someone who was in fact "done wrong" by making a statement in support of her on your website, in interviews giving her a shout out. There's various ways of telling the world West left his manners at home. But to vote for the highest award in country music because of that or even sympathy over the fact she's a woman and "they never win these things" is disrespectful all the way around.

So let's go all the way back to 2005. They year Keith Urban won EOTY. This is also the year the skeptics say he deserved it. Well let's look at the stats. In 2005 Keith Urban did not cross over into pop and become a teen sensation. In 2005 Keith Urban did not have the biggest selling country tour, Kenny Chesney did. It wasn't even in the top 10. In 2005, Keith Urban did not have the biggest selling country album, Rascal Flatts did. In 2005 only one of Keith's singles was in the Top 10 for that year. So how did he win? Well consummate musicianship for one and undeniable talent to boot. He combined the best of everything and brought it to the ticket buying public. It wasn't about stats or money. It was about the chance Keith Urban finally had with a headlining show to bring what he had brought every night at places like The Exit/In, and an album that had songs that will stand the test of country music time. Keith Urban had that this year, Brad Paisley had it this year. So what went wrong?

If we go back to CMA night 2009 it's clear Carrie Underwood's previous fan-voted ACM win had an influence on the outcome. Viewers who weren't Underwood devotees were angered. But at least the girl could sing live, even if it was at times bombastic. There was no consolation that night. Voters decided to go where the money was at and give it all to Taylor Swift. After she won FMOTY her EOTY win was a lock and I think every viewer watching their tv and those in the audience knew it. maclen proclaiming Swift as his dark horse was a joke because everyone knew it was to be her night. Headlines such as "CMA's Taylor-made for Swift" and Tim McGraw of all people presenting the EOTY award foretold the outcome. Even in her acceptance speech Taylor thanked all the other nominees for "letting me" open for them. Everything pointed to a night where a teen dream was to take it all even if she wasn't at the set standards.

Now the skeptics are becoming more hypocritical by the post. nomorefan months ago was obsessed with pushing Brad Paisley and yet she's defending Taylor's win. She commends her for putting alot into the stage presentation. Ha! Didn't that used to be her criticism of Urban? That he's got too many bells and whistles because the music sucks? And of course her complaint that Keith doesn't deserve it because he's worked hard this year according to some other skeptics. Yes nomorefan, the award is only for this year, not 1977. Then there's Mimosa who thinks she's "objective" when it comes to KU. She can analyze his addiction problems from a state over. She's a miracle worker. And of course there's erniesmom who is on her way to a dead end with the Hope For Derailment Campaign. It's the dumb following the dumber.


This award is for the act displaying the greatest competence in all aspects of the entertainment field.

The bottom line is EOTY should above all never be awarded to someone who cannot sing or play well live. That should be the cornerstone of the award. Even Kenny Chesney who has a nasal tenor accomplishes this.

But there is one skeptic who at least has a few brain cells left and that's imahick. If you look at the after-effect of the CMA's being Swiftered here's the truth. Almost everyone was more of a loser than a winner. At least imahick can see that. And even nomorefan's pretend new favorite, Darius Rucker, couldn't beat out Swift if he was headlining.


Brad Paisley, 7 nominations and only 2 wins
Kenny Chesney, 3 nominations and zero wins
Keith Urban, 5 nominations and only 1 win
George Strait, 3 nominations and zero wins
Reba, 2 nominations and zero wins
Martina McBride, 1 nomination and no win
Carrie Underwood, 2 nominations and zero wins


Sane people can't ignore the stats. The skeptics will though and they'll come out looking stupid like they usually do which is fine with this blog. The artists going home with less than they should have will be fine too. For you the haters, ignorance is bliss I guess.



So readers stay tuned! Our next blog is all about things that the skeptics will really hate!

The Morning After

CONGRATULATIONS KEITH AND BRAD!

MUSICAL EVENT OF THE YEAR!




And for the skeptics who are already making asses of themselves...

erniesmom: "This tells me that we're not the only ones who believe the Train Wreck is COMING! He just has to accept the fact hes on the Big Decline....along with his Bride of Frankensteiin."


The IMAGINARY TRAINWRECK EXPRESS has been coming right around the bend for 4 years now. BAHAHAHA!

Skeptical: "His Bride of Frankenstein is the reason for his decline...Wonder how long before he'll be booking in Bransom."

That's Branson dearie. But we haven't heard that gem in a while. Do you have an original or logical thought at all in that brain of yours? And tell us this... when will EOTY losers Kenny Chesney and Brad Paisley be joining Keith at the theater? BAHAHAHA!

Nomorefan, as always you're completely full of shit!

ANALYSIS OF THE NIGHT TO COME...

The Claws Come Out Just In Time For Awards Week

NICOLE KIDMAN AND KEITH URBAN AT 2009 BMI HONORS




1urbanfan27: "He's gorgeous for sure...she's wearing my favorite colors...how considerate..."

cougar5: "It's a shame 27... I don't even want to look at the pics... of either of them .... after the recent "news". I wish he would make a statement saying that he didn't know and that he'll stop it ... or that it never happened... it really bothers me. A part of me just wants to tell him to go @#$%$ his kinky wife. Maybe I need to step away from the "news"."

1urbanfan27: "I know, cougar...I'm so used to dissapointing news now, I'm jaded...I have no use for the wife...but I can't back away from Keith...I tried that last year, for about 3 weeks..."

Secrets And Lies

Okay readers we've got alot of ground to cover; let's get cracking! We're not pulling any punches today so hold onto your hats!

*Maclen And the GQ cover As you may recall maclen claimed that Kidman could only get the cover of GQ magazine in the UK. Well the truth is Nine's promotion was well planned out with various covers internationally placed in the US, Japan and UK.







Predictably, Fergie as the most popular with the younger demo, showed up in Cosmo, also with a new cd to promote. And Penelope Cruz who has the best chance of being nominated for an Oscar out of the bunch got Vanity Fair. Does maclen even know who got the US cover of GQ? No he doesn't but the answer in no one from Nine. That honor goe to January Jones from AMC's television series Mad Men which is set to have its season finale in November. And by the way maclen, Kidman got a 10 page spread and interview. Yes, she's just so over!


* The GQ magazine itself Much has been made over the cover which shows Kidman wearing more than some women do to the beach. Also the "one glove" look was laughed about but of course, once looking inside the magazine you can see she had both on, one coming off in the course of the photo shoot. While these tame shots may be offensive to some who have a completely different set of values, rest assured the skeptics are only "offended" when it involves Nicole Kidman. We don't hear of them upset over January Jones' breasts half exposed on GQ. We don't hear how upset they are the Kate Hudson said men only think about sandwiches and sex, even though she is raising a son. But try and argue with them that their disdain is completely one sided and they'll trot out the "celebrity-obsessed" culture argument and "fans that worship the rich and famous are a stain on society" and "all celebrities get away with murder". We know one group of "fans" that are obsessed over a certain celebrity and his wife, don't we.

*The article and media manipulation After the article came out the skeptics declared Kidman was portrayed exactly like the context of her quotes. No her words weren't switched around, quotes weren't manufactured but nice try skeptics, you can't get anything past STS! Despite Kidman's exact words ending up all over the internet the media still was able to make her and the article into something it's not.

Take a look. Just from a quick search on Google and Twitter you can find these headlines....

Nicole Kidman reveals her love life has been kinky as she opens up about 'strange sexual fetish' encounters

Nicole Kidman Talks About Kinky Fetishes

Nicole Kidman's strange sexual fetish encounters

Nicole Kidman Admits Sexual Fetish

Nicole Kidman loved experimenting with strange sexual fetish stuff

Nicole Kidman opens up about 'strange sexual fetish stuff'

Now let's go back to the original quote of what Kidman actually said: "I’ve explored obsession. I’ve explored loss and love in terms of being in a grief-stricken place, I’ve explored strange sexual fetish stuff, I’ve explored the mundane aspect of marriage, and monogamy"

spaz1980:"Well I read the article and as far as I can tell nothing she was quoted saying was blown dramatically out of proportion by the media."

We're not that dumb spaz.

As you can see one line of a multipage interview was completely put to the forefront and falsely expanded. Kidman did not say she has fetishes, she did not say she enjoyed or loved them, she did not say they were kinky, she didn't open up or describe anything she took part in or who with or why, she never said she had "encounters". Oh how dark and sinister the media wants to make this out to be!

We also aren't buying the idea that the word "mundane" always has a negative context. Think about it from Kidman's perspective. Her career is out of the ordinary. Something as basic as marriage is mundane, or ordinary. Most of us do it, sometimes it's boring, sometimes we get stuck in a rut, sometimes it's not perfect bliss. It's not the red carpet, it's not traveling to foreign countries for filming, it's not being interviewed on tv. One can easily see the difference between the two worlds. Kidman did not saying anything negative against marriage. In fact quite the contrary, she's very much pro-commitment in this interview and others. But there's so much hate in the heads of those skeptics they can't see anything clearly.


Our response to the media and the skeptics is GET REAL. We aren't stupid enough to fall for how you decide to present someone for your own gain. Our favorite online response to "Nicole Kidman admits to sexual fetish" was by an anonymous poster who typed "Haven't we all?!" Hahaha!




*The Fake Prudes of E! online Yes they're back on the bashing bandwagon declaring Kidman an embarrassment for women and an embarrassment for victims of violence. We laugh in their faces. Why? Because one, they are liars who don't believe their own words and two, even if they did their argument doesn't add up. Let's explore!

The skeptics don't understand the difference between sex/sexuality/sensuality of being a woman and simply being a sex object. What this world needs is more positive messages about sex and body image, especially to young girls. The skeptics do nothing but perpetuate the problem of girls thinking sex is dirty and shouldn't be discussed. Nudity in film, sex in literature and poetry is nothing to be ashamed of exploring. But Oh "so "Leery whose ideas are so antiquated she'd like to take back the woman's right to vote wants you to think otherwise. The skeptics are completely anti-women. We don't believe her nonsense because we think she is there on the threads for a reason....to stir up trouble for anyone who dares to post there with common sense. In fact we think she might also be there to irritate other skeptics that certain other skeptics don't like. Being confident in your body, owning your own beauty and personal sexuality does not mean you have to cover up like a nun. It also doesn't mean you need to parade around nude either for no reason.

But let's get back to the skeptics. If they think Kidman's photos are sinful why do they not have the same reaction to ex-girlfriend and model Niki Taylor? One could argue it's about age. Okay well that doesn't work either because Kidman has done nudity in films and more provocative photo shoots at a younger age and before she had kids and that's been criticized too. Let's take this even further....what about Keith Urban? The skeptics didn't have a problem with his Playgirl shoot until he said he wished he hadn't done it. Then they turned the tables on him and called him a famewhore just trying to get ahead. But an even bigger issue which they've neglected to bring up recently is the Raining On Sunday music video. They didn't have a problem with the treatment Trey Fanjoy created until Keith named his daughter Sunday. Right at that point, ROS became a song Radney Foster wrote about fucking, the video was about fucking, and Keith is one dirty little pervert. See readers, there's only offense taken, there's only criticism raised when the skeptics want it for an argument. At the shows when they desperately try to stand under the fountain of water Keith sprays from his mouth, or when they still swoon over a "baby" or "sweetheart" it's never inappropriate for them to lust over a married man and father. They don't care about the wife and baby. They don't care about their own husbands or families.


But here's the best part....

All of them are only part time prudes. Behind the scenes after they lie and bash Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban, the skeptics are rockin' the sex toys, tongue gestures, ball handling, breast groping, and the penis art made out of produce. They are loving the male cross-dressing live show, shitting themselves over Jake Owen, watching Jimmy Wayne's tush as he dances, joining fanclubs just to get closer to male artists and consuming large amounts of alcohol in the process. And there's pictures to prove it.


Women like nomorefan and astilbe don't give a hoot about their families. They pretend they do, but their form of working on their marriage is stuffing hubby's face with food so they have more internet time. Sex isn't a dirty word for them. While they pretend that intercourse is only for baby-making and they want us to think they climb into bed with their flannel nightgown down to their ankles to get their wifely duty over with once a month, here's whats really going on in their heads. They are jealous women with a capital J. Jealous of Nicole and all the other wives and girlfriends of country stars they lust after. They want Keith to do them while swinging from a chandelier in his Nashville home, the one they are upset they can't get into. They want these men and they want them bad.


*The 3-Part Post at Urban Myths

Yes a reader over there was praised for her lengthy bash at Nicole Kidman. So much so that they clamored for it to be its own blog entry.

hoosierlady: "Wonderfully written, easy to read, applause, applause!!!!!"

LMAO! It's wonderfully written because it says nothing new, written by a semi-new username but not a new skeptic, covering all the old recycled hater talking points. It's easy to read because the skeptics have the talking points memorized. They don't have to read it, they know it by heart already! Applause applause because the more Kidman bashing the better, so they think!

We at STS are so confident this latest blog is junk here's a direct link to read it.

http://umyths.blogspot.com/2009/11/behind-nicole-kidmans-perfectly.html

That's something you won't see on Urban Myths, or should we say Urban Lies. In their little universe this blog doesn't exist. maclen doesn't have the cajones to acknowledge or refute the facts this blog presents each and every week. "Behind Nicole Kidman...." is just another piece written that the Urban Myths mod doesn't have to come up with herself. maclen got a break and UrbanMyths is saving her typing for the CMA's.

*The Fake Flu and The Fake Baby yes Nicole Kidman according to the skeptics staged a fake trip to the doctors office for Sunday. She's not really sick, after all....

spaz1980: "She looked happy and alert not lethargic or grumpy"


Really now! Funny Sunday isn't smiling at anything in the pics but today she's happy. Before with the same expression on her face all of you stated as sure as fact, she was a miserable child.

The skeptics are horrible liars.


*The Gang At CMT


Yes readers you probably know by now there's a skeptic contingency at Keith Urban's CMT message board. They pretend they aren't skeptics, and that they don't read the E! threads or the private boards. Our favorite line from 1urbanfan27 when she's been caught with the snide remarks is "Go back to your blogs." Oh 27, you've been a busy little beaver all over the internet. Let's take a look.

So we come to find out how obsessed 1urbanfan27 is. 1urbanfan27 is cynical_gal on E! but she's also breathingmusic72 at Monkeyville. If the charming cosmic username isn't enough of a giveaway the avatar of Keith Urban before his wife or past few girlfriends is.

When a few fans were upset over Keith's artistic decision to leave some of the NY venues via cab, guess who was the first to defend them and their overboard reactions? Good ol breathingmusic72.

72: "Who gets to say what's negative and what isn't."

Well apparently you do urbanfan27. Easily predictable as the CMT gang are 1urbanfan27, cougar5,and 1Sweetness1982 decided to rip into Nicole over the GQ article. Taking a page from the Oh "so " Leery playbook perhaps?

1urbanfan27: ".I also would never talk about my marriage like that...It sounds ominous and worries me...You can say what you want about my negativity, but that picture and that article are negative...No doubt..."


1sweetness1982: " Oh, but the part about marriage to Keith being raw and dangerous, I mean seriously, after I stopped laughing, I thought firstly, no wait, firstly I thought she is so full...then secondly I thought no, raw and dangerous is walking into a pit of snakes, dangerous is driving through the desert when your gas tank symbol is flashing empty, marriage, oh my god, marriage is bliss, isn't it? Well, that's what they've led us to believe."

1urbanfan27: "You would think they would know when to shut up...God, I really hope for something else for Keith...Peace and true soul connection...I know that's what he always wanted.."


Yes, you can speak for Keith Urban but no one on the CMT board gets you. Well we do including cougar who admits you have an obsession she hopes you get over.

And this...taking a page from the Mimosa playbook?

1urbanfan27: "And get this straight please...The "little one" has nothing to do with my feelings toward NK...She's an innocent...If there is anything in this world that I care about it is the innocence of children and their protection"


We'll end our skewering of urbanfan27 with her own words...."I said you can't see if someone is happy...".

So why do you insist Keith is so unhappy? You disrespect the man you claim to love. But that's what happens when obsession goes too far.

Here's something to respect, Nicole's statement about her marriages.

"I sort of feel like it is disrespectful of my current marriage to speak of my past marriage".

Kidman keeps all of what she says to a minimum, even about herself. She can't prevent the media from asking about Tom Cruise, but she can give honest answers that don't give away the farm. If you are going to give an interview that's the way it should be. Engaging the reader but not giving all of yourself or your relationships away. It's quite amusing...the skeptics want absolutely nothing of Kidman and absolutely everything of Keith Urban.

Were you wondering about the blog title for today? Well it comes down to this: Nicole Kidman will go to her grave with her secrets and her stories. The skeptics are so transparent they don't have any secrets. All they have are lies.


******UPDATE******

Thanks to a reader for this current interview in which Keith addresses the new tattoo, the GQ article, Italy, and the "fake" flu. You can listen HERE. And thanks to Keith for debunking all the skeptics!

Look Out, The Bitch Is Back!

BAHAHAHAHAHA!

Check out this exchange between Mimosa and a fellow skeptic!

nosoytonta: Now, just to be in the same page, you are comparing her with Keith's acting skills, right? or is it comparing her singing skills to his? either way she lost.

Mimosa: Your sarcasm is noted, but FYI...expect a debate when you post here.



Then later, nomorefan tries to tag team with Mimosa to prove a fan wrong who was actually at the Today show.

nomorefan: I heard Matt announced after Mr. Nicole Kidman's performance that he would be returning for another song (third), and then Hoda announced a little bit
later that Mr. Nicole Kidman was gone. Why would Hoda announce that if he was scheduled to be gone anyway? Also, when they have a performer on the show, they usually have them singing their last song
at the end of the show to close it out.

Mimosa: Exactly.


KM1AR2KI6EU: I was there, were any of you there? Yeah, I didn't think so. I don't care what Matt said. It was two songs and two songs only, Matt was mistaken. Have none of you ever heard an announcer say something that was incorrect? But why let the truth stand in your way, when it's so much more interesting to make up stories.


Mimosa: For all you know, we could've been. It's as likely as you being there. This is the negative thread, and only negative comments are allowed here. If you want to post good things about Kinkthy, go to another thread.




imahick: I'm wondering why the truth is so unacceptable? It isn't like it's a positive thing if someone mentions that they were at the show and Keith was scheduled to sing two songs, not three. It's just someone who was there and is clarifying what REALLY happened.

nosoytonta: Why, darling, I think I have the answer to that question. Apparently, it is because we are at the negative thread. Truth is acceptable only if it is negative towards KUNK (the thread's name is called Keith Urban Negative Thread, however, anything KU implies NK so there you have it). No positive things are allowed to say even if it is the truth because, you know, it is the negative thread.


So even other skeptics are calling Mimosa, the bitch with all bark and no bite, out on her bullshit. Oh so wise Mimosa wants a debate, but only when she's right, and can be more right than everyone else. That means her opinions are facts. And nothing is more important than negative comments, not even the truth! The more she yammers on about this being the negative thread the more she's exposing herself as an angry nut who doesn't care about reality!

It is quite unfortunate for the skeptics that Mimosa and nomorefan are dumb enough to challenge someone who does in pursue the profession she says she does and has attended other concerts in NY. In fact, that proof goes back months. We know Mimosa didn't cross the Sweet Tea line to see the Today show, just as we know nomorefan didn't ride a snowmobile all the way to New York City. Dumb as she is, nmf admitted previously she watched the program on tv so she couldn't help out her nuttybuddy with another tall tale. No Mimosa, it's not as likely you or the other haters were there, but the woman who said she was there, actually being there, is as likely as you lying and bullying to serve your own agenda! A sure thing!

The skeptics don't need fans to self-destruct and incriminate themselves. They only need each other!


******UPDATE******

Mimosa is now pulling out of her butt an alleged secret explanation from "Keith's people" on "another site" that refutes the real one. Only she wont post a link. And she'd probably like us to think there's KU employees who are skeptics who spill secrets.

Hmmmm...wasn't it months ago that the skeptics said Nashville doesn't talk...oh but it's only to them. And since when do Keith's people provide explanations about his personal life on a message board, or any board?

We're calling this what it is.....a big stinkin' pile of dog poo!!!!

And we're sure nomorefan enjoyed searching for the lastest GQ article!

Your Morning Prune Danish Skeptics!

Well well well, it's a fine fall morning where we are. Here's some bad news to go with your breakfast, skeptics.

First we have the confirmation of Gwyneth Paltrow to the cast of Kidman's upcoming project The Danish Girl.

Full article at Variety available HERE

It was incorrectly predicted by INEPT TEAM MACLEN that this project would never happen after Charlize Theron dropped out, of course due to Kidman. But we know better readers don't we. She dropped out of more than just the Danish film and restructured her schedule to star in a Mad Max sequel. Maclen then tried to change his tune and proclaim that it would take months to find a replacement as no one would want to join the cast.













PALS KEVYN AUCOIN, NICOLE KIDMAN,

AND GWYNETH PALTROW IN 2001.















Then just yesterday, INEPT TEAM MACLEN, posted this

".there is nothing on the replacement front to he supposed next self made flick, Danish Girl."

Wrong, wrong, and wrong again! Not only did he ignore the rumor that Paltrow was in line for the role, but he ignored the Variety article confirming her acceptance as well. If there's one positive thing you can say about INEPT TEAM MACLEN, it's that he definitely lives up to his name!

To add insult to injury, he is also ignorant of the fact that Kidman's publicist has already denied the story that she will be co-starring with Robert Pattinson in Bel Ami.

maclen: "the "erotic" flick she is to...or not...or maybe... star with Twilight's Pattinson is swirling on the news nets"


Next we have Keith's good news. Not only is he nominated for an ARIA in his home country of Australia, but he is opening the show. The ARIA's are the Aussie equivalent of the Grammys; what an honor for Keith! Keith is also scheduled to perform at the American Music Awards where he is nominated for Best Country Artist.
Keith's successful 2009 tour won the Concert Marketing & Promotion Award for the Escape Together tour sponsored by Kingsford and KC Masterpiece.



And finally we come to Choice who feels the need to comment more on other people's blogs than his own. The inaccuracy of maclen seems to have already rubbed off on poor pathetic Choice.

Choice: Maclen - UNIFEM have the shits with her, I can feel it. I would say they are concerned about the image she is projecting on this magazine cover. Not an ideal spokesperson to speak at anything, anymore. Just occurred to me. Chanel dropped her. Now we may see UNIFEM drop her. The AFI ignored her from their nominations too. I mean things come in three.

Clearly it's Choice's choice to remain ignorant down under but we have the proof he is wrong again. UNIFEM is not dropping the woman that has helped them in their efforts over the flu.

UN launches campaign harnessing support to end violence against women

6 November 2009 – The United Nations kicked off a campaign today mobilizing people around the world to take part in a drive to stop the pandemic of violence suffered by women at the hands of men.

The UN Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM) launched a website to inspire individual efforts aimed at eradicating violence against women, such as reaching out to school students, volunteering at local shelters, advocating for legislation or donating funds for programmes that protect women and girls.

The Say NO – Unite to End Violence against Women initiative’s website also aims to showcase the widespread problem – estimates say around 70 per cent of all women have been victim to some kind of violence – and demonstrate the groundswell of support by counting the number of deeds performed to combat the scourge.

“We know that violence against women is a problem with solutions,” said UNIFEM Executive Director Inés Alberdi after visiting patients at a one-stop health clinic for women victims of sexual violence in Nairobi, Kenya, to jump-start the international effort.

“What I have seen first-hand today in Kenya is the impact of effective work at the grassroots level, yet there is an urgent need for governments to make this issue a top priority and take decisive action,” said Ms. Alberdi.

Counting efforts by individuals, governments and civil society groups, the campaign has targeted 100,000 actions by March 2010 and 1 million by this time next year.

As an incentive, the luxury watch manufacturer OMEGA has pledged $50,000 to the scheme for the first 50,000 actions registered on the website, thanks to efforts by UNIFEM Goodwill Ambassador Nicole Kidman.

Throughout November, the multi-lingual broadcaster Euro News will air a public service announcement with Ms. Kidman, which calls on every individual to say no to all forms of violence.

Not only are they thankful for the success Kidman has helped them achieve, the statement also proves Kidman did not buy the Omega watches herself to generate good publicity as the skeptics insisted.

Complete with picture of the actress you can see press release
HERE.

We want to close this blog on a serious note. UNIFEM has started their new initiative. Please visit their site, Say NO To Violence. Send the link to anyone you think would be interested. Once there you can add your name to the global call for an end to violence, read up on efforts around the world, and see the latest PSA with Kidman. There's no reason not to support this cause.